From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
|
== Reception == |
|||
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org sandbox}} |
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org sandbox}} |
||
|
* viewed as an expansion of western philosophy |
|||
|
* similar to feminist literature, pointing out inconsistencies between Western Philosophy and issues of gender and race |
|||
|
* “hierarchical moral systems have tended to favor the lighter-skinned is striking…” (Johnson 190) |
|||
|
* Thomas McCarthy describes Mills work as “significant and compelling” |
|||
|
* Mill’s aim “is to pull together a vast array of the burgeoning literature on race and racism” (McCarthy 452) |
|||
|
* Stephen Steinburg “offers a bold conceptualization of the racial order and a critique of the way it has been (mis)represented within the domain of scholarship.” (Steinburg) |
|||
|
* Critiqued by Andrew Valls “The book is marred by some shortcomings…the arguments it presents are often too truncated to be persuasive…” (Valls 691) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:31, 16 October 2025
 |
This is a user sandbox of M30 05. You can use it for testing or practicing edits.
This is not the place where you work on your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. Visit your Dashboard course page and follow the links for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
- viewed as an expansion of western philosophy
- similar to feminist literature, pointing out inconsistencies between Western Philosophy and issues of gender and race
- “hierarchical moral systems have tended to favor the lighter-skinned is striking…” (Johnson 190)
- Thomas McCarthy describes Mills work as “significant and compelling”
- Mill’s aim “is to pull together a vast array of the burgeoning literature on race and racism” (McCarthy 452)
- Stephen Steinburg “offers a bold conceptualization of the racial order and a critique of the way it has been (mis)represented within the domain of scholarship.” (Steinburg)
- Critiqued by Andrew Valls “The book is marred by some shortcomings…the arguments it presents are often too truncated to be persuasive…” (Valls 691)
