User:Namelessposter: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 69: Line 69:

* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox|Sandbox]]: ”’Number one driver”’ (motor racing concept)

* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox|Sandbox]]: ”’Number one driver”’ (motor racing concept)

* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox2|Sandbox2]]: General testing

* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox2|Sandbox2]]: General testing

* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox3|Sandbox3]]: none

* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox3|Sandbox3]]:

== Formula One ==

== Formula One ==

Line 83: Line 83:

* [[George Russell (racing driver)|George Russell]]

* [[George Russell (racing driver)|George Russell]]

* [[Nicholas Latifi]]

* [[Nicholas Latifi]]

* [[File:Symbol_support_vote.svg|21x21px]] [[Mario Andretti]]—”saved from being added to [[WP:GAR]] on January 30, 2025 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMario_Andretti&diff=1272897821&oldid=1272896861 diff])

* [[File:Symbol_support_vote.svg|21x21px]] [[Mario Andretti]] from [[WP:GAR]] on January 30, 2025 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMario_Andretti&diff=1272897821&oldid=1272896861 diff])

* [[Team Enstone]]

* [[Team Enstone]]

* [[Flavio Briatore]]

* [[Flavio Briatore]]

Line 181: Line 181:

* [[Wikipedia:When to use or avoid “other stuff exists” arguments]]

* [[Wikipedia:When to use or avoid “other stuff exists” arguments]]

* [[Wikipedia:Don’t cite essays or proposals as if they were policy]]

* [[Wikipedia:Don’t cite essays or proposals as if they were policy]]

==Notes==

{{notelist}}


Latest revision as of 03:35, 24 November 2025

I like editing Formula One pages, although I often find myself editing pages about movies. Some contributions are listed below.

What I’m working on

[edit]

Substantially rewrote

[edit]

I think film plot summaries should cover key themes and character arcs, not just details. My rule of thumb is that if a fact is implied, it goes in the synopsis, like Diary of a Country Priest; a minimalist like Robert Bresson is nearly incomprehensible unless you affirmatively make certain connections. If it’s subtext or allusive, it goes in the analysis/themes section, like Pickpocket or Megalopolis. Obviously, this is a grey area and reasonable people can disagree. I find that using efn footnotes helps bridge the gap.

Major contributions

[edit]

Multiple contributions

[edit]

Wrote or revised synopses

[edit]

Other contributions

[edit]

I generally subscribe to the ideas articulated in the following essays:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version