From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
|
* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox|Sandbox]]: ”’Number one driver”’ (motor racing concept) |
* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox|Sandbox]]: ”’Number one driver”’ (motor racing concept) |
||
|
* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox2|Sandbox2]]: General testing |
* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox2|Sandbox2]]: General testing |
||
|
* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox3|Sandbox3]]: |
* [[User:Namelessposter/sandbox3|Sandbox3]]: |
||
|
== Formula One == |
== Formula One == |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
|
* [[George Russell (racing driver)|George Russell]] |
* [[George Russell (racing driver)|George Russell]] |
||
|
* [[Nicholas Latifi]] |
* [[Nicholas Latifi]] |
||
|
* [[File:Symbol_support_vote.svg|21x21px]] [[Mario Andretti]] |
* [[File:Symbol_support_vote.svg|21x21px]] [[Mario Andretti]] from [[WP:GAR]] on January 30, 2025 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMario_Andretti&diff=1272897821&oldid=1272896861 diff]) |
||
|
* [[Team Enstone]] |
* [[Team Enstone]] |
||
|
* [[Flavio Briatore]] |
* [[Flavio Briatore]] |
||
| Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
|
* [[Wikipedia:When to use or avoid “other stuff exists” arguments]] |
* [[Wikipedia:When to use or avoid “other stuff exists” arguments]] |
||
|
* [[Wikipedia:Don’t cite essays or proposals as if they were policy]] |
* [[Wikipedia:Don’t cite essays or proposals as if they were policy]] |
||
|
==Notes== |
|||
|
{{notelist}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 03:35, 24 November 2025
I like editing Formula One pages, although I often find myself editing pages about movies. Some contributions are listed below.
|
About Me
|
What I’m working on
[edit]
Substantially rewrote
[edit]
I think film plot summaries should cover key themes and character arcs, not just details. My rule of thumb is that if a fact is implied, it goes in the synopsis, like Diary of a Country Priest; a minimalist like Robert Bresson is nearly incomprehensible unless you affirmatively make certain connections. If it’s subtext or allusive, it goes in the analysis/themes section, like Pickpocket or Megalopolis. Obviously, this is a grey area and reasonable people can disagree. I find that using efn footnotes helps bridge the gap.
Major contributions
[edit]
- Diary of a Country Priest (1951)—synopsis, screenplay, themes, awards, reception
- Four Nights of a Dreamer (1971)—synopsis, production, reception, distribution
- Amadeus (1984)—synopsis, historicity, director’s cut
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992)—synopsis, production, themes, reception, reappraisal, Twin Peaks: The Missing Pieces- Uncut Gems (2019)—synopsis, production, reception
- Megalopolis (2024)—synopsis, themes
Multiple contributions
[edit]
- Pickpocket (1959)—synopsis, themes
- Mirror (1975)—synopsis, editing style, release, reception
- Anora (2024)—synopsis, production
- Conclave (2024)—synopsis, reception
- Oh, Canada (2024)—synopsis, production
- The Phoenician Scheme (2025)—synopsis, production
- The Mastermind (2025)—synopsis, production
Wrote or revised synopses
[edit]
Other contributions
[edit]
I generally subscribe to the ideas articulated in the following essays:

