Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tyler James Robinson: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 10: Line 10:

{{archive bot}}

{{archive bot}}

{{atop|If you want to contribute to the deletion discussion, do it there, not here on the talk page. –[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 23:42, 21 September 2025 (UTC)}}

== Deletion of Tyler James Robinson’s Wikipedia Page ==

== Deletion of Tyler James Robinson’s Wikipedia Page ==

Line 21: Line 22:

Removing a page about a major event for any reason is bias. This goes against what Wikipedia has always stood for. Keep the page; keep out the bias. [[User:NoxieBear139|NoxieBear139]] ([[User talk:NoxieBear139|talk]]) 19:31, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Removing a page about a major event for any reason is bias. This goes against what Wikipedia has always stood for. Keep the page; keep out the bias. [[User:NoxieBear139|NoxieBear139]] ([[User talk:NoxieBear139|talk]]) 19:31, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

{{abot}}


Latest revision as of 23:43, 21 September 2025


Robinson is now apart of modern day American history and if we are able to have Lee Harvey Oswald and James Earl Ray on Wikipedia why be biased and get rid of Robinson’s page? (I don’t support Charlie Kirk or his killer but I feel it goes against Wikipedia’s unbiased stance when it comes to information) 50.4.234.44 (talk) 12:40, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of personal views about the situation, the shooter, or the outcome of recent events, the facts should speak for themselves. If you find the content objectionable, you can choose not to read it. If you do not want your children to access this information, the responsibility lies in educating them and setting appropriate restrictions, rather than removing information you disagree with. May we remain committed to truth and open access to knowledge. May God bless us all. 2601:244:5688:2A50:828:87E3:B10C:4581 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a page about a major event for any reason is bias. This goes against what Wikipedia has always stood for. Keep the page; keep out the bias. NoxieBear139 (talk) 19:31, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top