Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


Line 22: Line 22:

* as a substitute for the talk pages of individual articles, including that of the main Bristol article

* as a substitute for the talk pages of individual articles, including that of the main Bristol article

However, you may post alerts and links to such conversations here.

However, you may post alerts and links to such conversations here.

== Good article reassessment for [[Ashton Court]] ==

[[Ashton Court]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ashton Court/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 15:44, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

== Good article reassessment for [[Manor Hall, Bristol]] ==

== Good article reassessment for [[Manor Hall, Bristol]] ==


Revision as of 04:09, 14 January 2026

This page is for discussing:

  • the project, its aims, achievements and directions
  • general page style and layout issues
  • content issues which affect several pages

It is not intended for:

  • specific page content issues
  • as a substitute for the talk pages of individual articles, including that of the main Bristol article

However, you may post alerts and links to such conversations here.

Manor Hall, Bristol has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:41, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Buildings and architecture of Bristol for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare “Keep” or “Delist” in regards to the article’s featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 02:16, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top