[[User:Clayoquot]], I can now satisfy your curiosity (I also was curious to see what it could look like). So some members of the team have been working on some initial sketches to address a list of initial needs. <br>
[[User:Clayoquot]], I can now satisfy your curiosity (I also was curious to see what it could look like). So some members of the team have been working on some initial sketches to address a list of initial needs. <br>
Those sketches may be found : [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Visual_Analytics_for_Sustainability_and_Climate_Change/Tool/Co-design_activities here]
Those sketches may be found : [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Visual_Analytics_for_Sustainability_and_Climate_Change/Tool/Co-design_activities here]
I have two propositions for you…
I have two propositions for you…
# You can look at them at your own pace and drop comments below. Is the sketch clear ? Do you think it would be a useful visualisation for you or for others ? Any initial design choices you think could be improved ? Etc.
# You can look at them at your own pace and drop comments below. Is the sketch clear ? Do you think it would be a useful visualisation for you or for others ? Any initial design choices you think could be improved ? Etc.
# If you want to chat about them, I have set up a time for this on this Friday. See the event page, and subscribe/join if you have the time and interest. The event page is : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:VIZWP_24_10_2025
# If you want to chat about them, I have set up a time for this on this Friday. See the event page, and subscribe/join if you have the time and interest. The event page is : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:VIZWP_24_10_2025
[[User:Chipmunkdavis]]. Quality assessment is one of the parameters proposed to sort out articles. <br>
[[User:Chipmunkdavis]]. Quality assessment is one of the parameters proposed to sort out articles. <br>
If you look in the menu>tool, you may see the different ways that will be proposed to « Import » lists. The one thing that is not sorted out at all is how « clusters » of articles will be done from a specific list. This will have to be sorted out. But importing list of articles is not an issue.
If you look in the menu>tool, you may see the different ways that will be proposed to « Import » lists. The one thing that is not sorted out at all is how « clusters » of articles will be done from a specific list. This will have to be sorted out. But importing list of articles is not an issue.
Last… there is also an ongoing survey I really would love to see some of you answer to. The goal is simply to further collect insights on what type of visuals/data might be more useful for you (again, not visuals to display in articles, but visuals to analyse articles).
”’The survey may be found here: https://survey.linux.it/index.php/189183?lang=en”’
[[User:Anthere|Anthere]] ([[User talk:Anthere|talk]]) 12:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
[[User:Anthere|Anthere]] ([[User talk:Anthere|talk]]) 12:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
 |
This WikiProject is to organise climate change related articles. Use this talk page for discussion of issues that may involve multiple articles. Any article-specific discussion should take place on the talk page of the relevant article. |
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q125928#Confusing_definition_and_inconsistent_Wikipedia_articles
I am going to bed now – Goodnight https://xkcd.com/386/ Chidgk1 (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- That’s not how the comic says this should go. Relatedly, should wikidata include “Also known as: climatic variation, climate variability, climatic change”? The first two don’t seem accurate at all, I would intuitively suggest they refer to other topics. Ghits on the third mostly refer to a scientific journal. CMD (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Climate variability is usually about shorter time scales, whereas climatic changes are about longer timescales. There is a large bit in the middle where some scientist call something variability while others call it climate change, depending on what they’re studying. So not synonymous, no. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
It would be great if you could comment at Talk:Social cost of carbon#AI generated image Chidgk1 (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
m:Visualizing sustainability and climate change on Wikipedia. A Research Programme started in 2025 to identify and visualize knowledge gaps related to sustainability and climate change on Wikipedia.
Interested to learn more ? Read and add your name on m:Visual Analytics for Sustainability and Climate Change/Community… or just react/ask questions here 🙂
Anthere (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Anthere. Welcome to the Wikiproject, and lovely to see this project take shape! Could you give an example of what you mean by visualising knowledge gaps? You might be interested in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Climate change/Figures page, an inactive project that sought to improve and update climate change data visualisation across the board. More recently, TatjanaClimate has been working with various organisations to release climate-related media onto Commons. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Anthere, good to see you here. To be honest, I have tried to understand the page you linked to and I don’t feel like I’m getting it. There is a participatory design process, but what is it designing? Are there examples we can see of what similar research projects have designed?
- I am also curious about “ According to the results of our preliminary project, volunteers need their curiosity to be stimulated…” where can i resd more about this preliminary project? Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 08:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
- “So far, most of the campaigns manually curate lists of articles every time, going through article by article to assess quality, and often without being able to compare across different linguistic editions of Wikipedia easily.” That sounds where we are and generally have always been. I am curious to see the ideas underlying making such curation more accessible and visual. I know Wikidata captures GA and FA equivalents across wikis, unsure if SPARQL can get more granular assessments. CMD (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Ok, I am back with more info. First, thank you User:Femke. But this is not this type of visualisations I was talking about (but those are really cool). Those are visualisation of the articles structure and content, comparisond between linguistic version (to foster translation efforts), analysis of the semantic content of the articles etc. that I am talking about.
User:Clayoquot, I can now satisfy your curiosity (I also was curious to see what it could look like). So some members of the team have been working on some initial sketches to address a list of initial needs.
Those sketches may be found : here
I have two propositions for you…
- You can look at them at your own pace and drop comments below the sketches. Is the sketch clear ? Do you think it would be a useful visualisation for you or for others ? Any initial design choices you think could be improved ? Etc.
- If you want to chat about them, I have set up a time for this on this Friday. See the event page, and subscribe/join if you have the time and interest. The event page is : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:VIZWP_24_10_2025
User:Chipmunkdavis. Quality assessment is one of the parameters proposed to sort out articles.
The current pre-work of the future tool may be seen here : https://giovannipro.github.io/wikipedia-climate-change/?lang=en
You may wonder where the list of articles we have been working on for this pilot project come from. Short answer: your work. The data investigation process is described here : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Visual_Analytics_for_Sustainability_and_Climate_Change/Articles
One person reworked the output and clarified the selection for the pilot, and also aggregated them in cluster. Final list is here : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ipk-XgiRcBwf-cEcN98dNmrapCHX57NwQoHDxEMPMSg/edit?gid=0#gid=0
But in the future, the tool will be « merged » with this tool : https://impact-visualizer.wmcloud.org/topics/23
The impact visualizer current Draw content primarily from the outreach dashboard (used by editors during workshops). However, it also permit to add content based on using page piles. For example, I did a test using the content I have been working on the past 4 years related to WIPO. I created a page pile with the list of articles I worked on. Then I used the full list to do this : https://impact-visualizer.wmcloud.org/topics/29
If you look in the menu>tool, you may see the different ways that will be proposed to « Import » lists. The one thing that is not sorted out at all is how « clusters » of articles will be done from a specific list. This will have to be sorted out. But importing list of articles is not an issue.
Last… there is also an ongoing survey I really would love to see some of you answer to. The goal is simply to further collect insights on what type of visuals/data might be more useful for you (again, not visuals to display in articles, but visuals to analyse articles).
The survey may be found here: https://survey.linux.it/index.php/189183?lang=en
Anthere (talk) 12:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
If you are busy then no need to think about the wording yet, but if one or two of you could say yes or no in principle that would be great. Because the wording is a little tricky, so if you are against in principle I won’t spend time on it. Please answer at Talk:Climate change#Add the word “coal” to lead? If so how? Chidgk1 (talk) 06:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
I am finding tidying up Glossary of climate change after merge tedious – will finish eventually but help welcome Chidgk1 (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/series/the-big-emitters Chidgk1 (talk) 06:34, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
