Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

Line 17: Line 17:

*{{vandal|Demnaozi}} – On {{No redirect|:Georgian language}}: vandalism after recent release of block. Immediately after lift of block, the editor is once again editing the article to say something other than what the cited source says, and is opting out of discussing their intentions. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 15:42, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

*{{vandal|Demnaozi}} – On {{No redirect|:Georgian language}}: vandalism after recent release of block. Immediately after lift of block, the editor is once again editing the article to say something other than what the cited source says, and is opting out of discussing their intentions. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 15:42, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

*:{{AIV|dc}} And yet no one’s gone to revert them. I [[WP:AGF|generally assume]] that if people leave edits along, that means they don’t have a problem with them … [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

*:{{AIV|dc}} And yet no one’s gone to revert them. I [[WP:AGF|generally assume]] that if people leave edits along, that means they don’t have a problem with them … [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

*::@[[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] Huh? I haven’t reverted it because I thought that returning directly to the sort of edits to the same article that led to the original block immediately after expiration of the block would obviously lead to a new block, and I figured I’d revert after the new block had been imposed so as not to trigger another wave of edits and reversions. Now you’re declining the request because I chose stability? [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 19:45, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

*::@[[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] Huh? I haven’t reverted it because I thought that returning directly to the sort of edits to the same article that led to the original block immediately after expiration of the block would obviously lead to a new block, and I figured I’d revert after the new block had been imposed so as not to trigger another wave of edits and reversions. Now you’re declining the request because I chose stability? [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 19:45, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

* {{IPvandal|1=2409:40C2:129A:DC44:E45F:EDFF:FEDC:4812}} Vandalism after final warning. [[User:BrandNewSaint|BrandNewSaint]] ([[User talk:BrandNewSaint|talk]]) 18:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

* {{IPvandal|1=2409:40C2:129A:DC44:E45F:EDFF:FEDC:4812}} Vandalism after final warning. [[User:BrandNewSaint|BrandNewSaint]] ([[User talk:BrandNewSaint|talk]]) 18:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

*:{{AIV|pb|[[Mohammad Yousuf (cricketer)]]}} added to block on /22 [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

*:{{AIV|pb|[[Mohammad Yousuf (cricketer)]]}} added to block on /22 [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Noticeboard for persistent vandalism

• Sifawa12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Warned user. This should go to BLPN, too, if it persists. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cgg2222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• HuaDjou (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:26, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. This looks like a returned previously block user sniffing out their old accounts. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Morellet1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:15, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators’ noticeboard/Edit warring. This seems to be headed there. And the article and AfD that gave rise to all this seem to be headed for delete as a result in any event. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2a02:c7e:669d:9300:ac1a:830a:918:9b74 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User-reported

• Demnaozi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Georgian language: vandalism after recent release of block. Immediately after lift of block, the editor is once again editing the article to say something other than what the cited source says, and is opting out of discussing their intentions. Largoplazo (talk) 15:42, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined. And yet no one’s gone to revert them. I generally assume that if people leave edits along, that means they don’t have a problem with them … Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Daniel Case Huh? I haven’t reverted it because I thought that returning directly to the sort of edits to the same article that led to the original block immediately after expiration of the block would obviously lead to a new block, and I figured I’d revert after the new block had been imposed so as not to trigger another wave of edits and reversions. I reported their latest edits here because I had a problem with them. Now you’re declining the request because I chose stability? Largoplazo (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2409:40C2:129A:DC44:E45F:EDFF:FEDC:4812 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. BrandNewSaint (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Partially blocked (from Mohammad Yousuf (cricketer)). added to block on /22 Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Banovercheckcross (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Obvious Willy on Wheels (a WP:LTA) sock. Created a now-deleted “Willy on Wheels” item on Wikidata. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]