From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|
*”’Delete”’. Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NACTOR]]. Merely being on a reality show(s) does not indicate an automatic pass of [[WP:NENTERTAINER]]. The subject has to demonstrate that their contribution to the show was ”significant” per that language in the SNG guideline. The sourcing here doesn’t demonstrate that what Abhora did on these reality shows was in fact “significant”. Further one of the sources used is unreliable because it is a live podcast which is a [[WP:PRIMARY]] source.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 16:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC) |
*”’Delete”’. Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NACTOR]]. Merely being on a reality show(s) does not indicate an automatic pass of [[WP:NENTERTAINER]]. The subject has to demonstrate that their contribution to the show was ”significant” per that language in the SNG guideline. The sourcing here doesn’t demonstrate that what Abhora did on these reality shows was in fact “significant”. Further one of the sources used is unreliable because it is a live podcast which is a [[WP:PRIMARY]] source.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 16:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*:But did you search for sources not used in the article? Sources [[Talk:Abhora|aren’t difficult to find]]. —[[User:Another Believer|<span style=”color:navy”>Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style=”color:#C60″>Talk</span>]])</sub> 16:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC) |
*:But did you search for sources not used in the article? Sources [[Talk:Abhora|aren’t difficult to find]]. —[[User:Another Believer|<span style=”color:navy”>Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style=”color:#C60″>Talk</span>]])</sub> 16:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:::Seeing a bunch of trivial [[WP:FANCRUFT]]/[[WP:TABLOID]] type reporting. Trivial current event coverage of this type is not significant, and it is [[WP:PRIMARY]] because it’s qualitative eyewitness/interview reporting. We need sources with analysis and context across time for the sources to become SECONDARY in order to demonstrate significance.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 16:23, 27 October 2025 (UTC) |
:::Seeing a bunch of trivial [[WP:FANCRUFT]]/[[WP:TABLOID]] type reporting. Trivial current event coverage of this type is not significant, and it is [[WP:PRIMARY]] because it’s qualitative eyewitness/interview reporting. We need sources with analysis and context across time for the sources to become SECONDARY in order to demonstrate significance.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 16:23, 27 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:24, 27 October 2025
- Abhora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NENTERTAINER, has so far been a participant in a single reality TV franchise, no WP:SIGCOV outside of that. WP:PSEUDO also applies. In the same way that we do not have articles for every participant on other reality shows (Big Brother for example), appearing on this show does not automatically assume notability. —woodensuperman 12:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep as per WP:Entertainer, for the same reasons Another Believer stated. Cornmazes (talk) 14:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Seeing a bunch of trivial WP:FANCRUFT/WP:TABLOID type reporting. Trivial current event coverage of this type is not significant, and it is WP:PRIMARY because it’s qualitative eyewitness/interview reporting. We need sources with analysis and context across time for the sources to become WP:SECONDARY in order to demonstrate significance.4meter4 (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
