From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|
*<small class=”delsort-notice”>Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|Companies]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Malta|Malta]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 00:42, 29 October 2025 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class=”delsort-notice”>Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|Companies]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Malta|Malta]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 00:42, 29 October 2025 (UTC)</small> |
||
|
* ”’Keep”’ — The topic appears to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. There are reliable and independent sources available or can be added that discuss ”Alkagesta”. The article can be improved with citations from books, academic papers, and independent media. Deletion is unnecessary when the article can be improved. [[User:JosefBrine|JosefBrine]] ([[User talk:JosefBrine|talk]]) 09:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC) |
* ”’Keep”’ — The topic appears to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. There are reliable and independent sources available or can be added that discuss ”Alkagesta”. The article can be improved with citations from books, academic papers, and independent media. Deletion is unnecessary when the article can be improved. [[User:JosefBrine|JosefBrine]] ([[User talk:JosefBrine|talk]]) 09:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
* ”’Keep”’ — The subject appears to have notability under Wikipedia’s general notability guideline (WP:GNG). While the current version of the article lacks sufficient citations, there are independent and reliable sources available (including books, news articles, and scholarly references) that discuss ”Alkagesta” and its relevance. The solution is to improve the article with reliable and secondary sources, not to delete it. Deletion should be a last resort when improvement is possible. [[User:JosefBrine|JosefBrine]] ([[User talk:JosefBrine|talk]]) 09:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:25, 29 October 2025
- Alkagesta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, No Reliable Sources., The Sources that presented in the article are unreliable. Article needs Reliable Sources and Seconday Sources. Untamed1910 (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Malta. Shellwood (talk) 00:42, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep — The topic appears to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. There are reliable and independent sources available or can be added that discuss Alkagesta. The article can be improved with citations from books, academic papers, and independent media. Deletion is unnecessary when the article can be improved. JosefBrine (talk) 09:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep — The subject appears to have notability under Wikipedia’s general notability guideline (WP:GNG). While the current version of the article lacks sufficient citations, there are independent and reliable sources available (including books, news articles, and scholarly references) that discuss Alkagesta and its relevance. The solution is to improve the article with reliable and secondary sources, not to delete it. Deletion should be a last resort when improvement is possible. JosefBrine (talk) 09:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
