Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anunay Sood: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 22: Line 22:

</ol></li>

</ol></li>

</ol>There is sufficient coverage in [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] to allow Anunay Sood to pass [[Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline]], which requires “significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]] of the subject”.<p>[[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 07:34, 11 November 2025 (UTC)</p>

</ol>There is sufficient coverage in [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]] to allow Anunay Sood to pass [[Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline]], which requires “significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]] of the subject”.<p>[[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 07:34, 11 November 2025 (UTC)</p>

:* ”’Keep”’ : It meets [[WP:GNG]], agree with [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] analysis.

:[[User:Unsosctent|Unsosctent]] ([[User talk:Unsosctent|talk]]) 08:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

:I appreciate the analysis, Cunard. I disagree about the two before-death citations. The Statesman article is written by “Statesman Web” and is gossip rag fodder; The Financial Express one doesn’t feel like significant coverage — that paragraph you’ve copied here is the entirety of his mention in a broader article about travel social media influencers. When I have a bit more time, I’ll look further at the “after his death” analysis. [[User:CountryANDWestern|CountryANDWestern]] ([[User talk:CountryANDWestern|talk]]) 10:41, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

:I appreciate the analysis, Cunard. I disagree about the two before-death citations. The Statesman article is written by “Statesman Web” and is gossip rag fodder; The Financial Express one doesn’t feel like significant coverage — that paragraph you’ve copied here is the entirety of his mention in a broader article about travel social media influencers. When I have a bit more time, I’ll look further at the “after his death” analysis. [[User:CountryANDWestern|CountryANDWestern]] ([[User talk:CountryANDWestern|talk]]) 10:41, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

</li></ul>

</li></ul>

* ”’Keep”’ : It meets [[WP:GNG]], agree with [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] analysis.

Latest revision as of 10:42, 11 November 2025

Anunay Sood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability and questionable sourcing. The sources seem to be two categories: wiki-like sources that provide the background information about him and sources covering his death. The former sources (like celebrityborns, whosthat 360) are unable to be used for prove notability as its user submitted content. The latter sources are shaky. Some of them are India celebrity gossip type pieces. A couple are just reposts of each other’s articles. The Independent may be the best source among them and it’s mostly just a summary from other sources. In a Google News search filtering out articles from the past few days, I see a few interviews with him with travel blogs, but nothing that truly establishes notability. A Business World article reads like a press release. One article that is gossip rag about a social media conflict he was in. None of these pieces show he is notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version