Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Gllamnik: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 16: Line 16:

*”’Speedy Delete”’ No clear source. [[User:Tythefishs|Tythefishs]] ([[User talk:Tythefishs|talk]]) 00:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

*”’Speedy Delete”’ No clear source. [[User:Tythefishs|Tythefishs]] ([[User talk:Tythefishs|talk]]) 00:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

* ”’Speedy delete”’: as a hoax. [[User:HurricaneZeta|<span style=”background-color:#ffd98c; color:black”>”’Hurricane”'</span>]][[User talk:HurricaneZeta|<span style=”background-color:#ffd98c; color:black”>”’Zeta”'</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/HurricaneZeta|C]]</sup> 14:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC) <!–VCB HurricaneZeta–>


Latest revision as of 14:14, 14 January 2026

Battle of Gllamnik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Body of the article is unsourced. None of the references listed mention a Battle in Gllamnik. Griboski (talk) 17:38, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete very poorly written article and hoax one as well and it’s not the first time Kosovian made ai, hoax and poorly written article with no sources provided, i think he should get reported at ANI because of this
Wikicommonsfan134 (talk) 09:16, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version