Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Catholic Messenger (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 14: Line 14:

:”’Comment”’@[[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] discuss here, I saw your comment on the previous discussion, and to answer, it looks like the page was recreated in 2022 by the same user, under a different account looking at the edit logs. [[User:Porfiriotorres991|Porfiriotorres991]] ([[User talk:Porfiriotorres991|talk]]) 21:44, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

:”’Comment”’@[[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] discuss here, I saw your comment on the previous discussion, and to answer, it looks like the page was recreated in 2022 by the same user, under a different account looking at the edit logs. [[User:Porfiriotorres991|Porfiriotorres991]] ([[User talk:Porfiriotorres991|talk]]) 21:44, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

::Could you link to the edit logs you’re referring to? [[User:Natemup|natemup]] ([[User talk:Natemup|talk]]) 02:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

::Could you link to the edit logs you’re referring to? [[User:Natemup|natemup]] ([[User talk:Natemup|talk]]) 02:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 03:28, 11 February 2026

Black Catholic Messenger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails basic WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Very seldom number of articles covering this, and the page was created and currently being edited by the co-founder of this. WP:YESPROMO WP:NOTABOUTYOU. It looked like the last AfD nomination had a delete consensus, I’m not sure why or how this is still up. It also looks as if the same user recreated this in 2022 under a different account name, looking back at edit logs in the page as well as the past discussion post. I linked it below

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Black_Catholic_Messenger

Porfiriotorres991 (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment@Oaktree b discuss here, I saw your comment on the previous discussion, and to answer, it looks like the page was recreated in 2022 by the same user, under a different account looking at the edit logs. Porfiriotorres991 (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could you link to the edit logs you’re referring to? I don’t think I’ve ever done edits under a second account. As far as I remember, the original version of this page was deleted, but was later recreated with better sources and has since been reviewed by numerous editors. That is to say, I think the issues you re-tagged have all been addressed already. But if there is any doubt about notability, I’ve added more sources. natemup (talk) 02:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top