From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
|
|
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|
* ”’Keep”’: I found several helpful references in [[The Hindu]] and added them to the article. The diocese has had more than its share of controversies, and those controversies have been covered by a reliable newspaper. [[User:Лисан аль-Гаиб|Лисан аль-Гаиб]] ([[User talk:Лисан аль-Гаиб|talk]]) 01:45, 21 November 2025 (UTC) <!–VCB Лисан аль-Гаиб–> |
* ”’Keep”’: I found several helpful references in [[The Hindu]] and added them to the article. The diocese has had more than its share of controversies, and those controversies have been covered by a reliable newspaper. [[User:Лисан аль-Гаиб|Лисан аль-Гаиб]] ([[User talk:Лисан аль-Гаиб|talk]]) 01:45, 21 November 2025 (UTC) <!–VCB Лисан аль-Гаиб–> |
||
|
*”’Keep”’ – needs clean up, but shows significant coverage. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 03:46, 21 November 2025 (UTC) |
*”’Keep”’ – needs clean up, but shows significant coverage. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 03:46, 21 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*”’Keep”’ as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion such as The Hindu, and New Indian Express and added to the article so that [[WP:GNG]] is met in my view, [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 23:21, 21 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:21, 21 November 2025
- Diocese of Coimbatore of the Church of South India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced, almost all info has zero sourcing to back it up. One of the few sources is a Facebook page. Additional citations tag has been in place for 5 years Appears to have been created by someone close to the church and is full of unsourced fluff. Only 3 sections have inline citations at all. More than that, no clear notability to me. aesurias (talk) 22:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and India. aesurias (talk) 22:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Plenty of solid news coverage of scandals in this diocese ([1], [2], [3]), so the article should be updated to reflect this secondary coverage. Coverage thus exists as would be presumed for a diocese of a mainline church per WP:DIOCESE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- (Article should be improved from its current state but WP:DINC. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC))
- Keep: I found several helpful references in The Hindu and added them to the article. The diocese has had more than its share of controversies, and those controversies have been covered by a reliable newspaper. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 01:45, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – needs clean up, but shows significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 03:46, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion such as The Hindu, and New Indian Express and added to the article so that WP:GNG is met in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:21, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
