Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirates SkyCargo Flight 9788: Difference between revisions

Emirates SkyCargo Flight 9788 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA – Routine kinds of news events (including most …accidents…), whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 02:00, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Theres plenty of other notable runway excursions. Miami Air for example, what about the Kai Tak one featured with this one? I dont see why this should be deleted, it’s definitely not portraying a news like article. Grffffff (talk) 02:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you voting keep??? Zaptain United (talk) 02:16, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am 108.247.26.224 (talk) 02:25, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Grffffff (talk) 02:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you are voting for keeping this article, then you should probably mark your comment as keep. I won’t do it because I think that is a violation of AFD rules. Zaptain United (talk) 02:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ehh but i think yall get the point hopefully Grffffff (talk) 02:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

me neither, it also involved a large aircraft, the 747-400, and 2 fatalities, which is very noteworthy for a runway excursion 2600:1702:65C4:6810:751D:2C1F:1A30:DA13 (talk) 02:16, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it’s the first hull loss of a 747 in a long time, and there were 2 fatalities, which is very uncommon and noteworthy. 108.247.26.224 (talk) 02:21, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep If this accident occurrence on passenger plane, the casualties maybe very serious! You may refer CI605 accident at 1993 for the plane ran off the runway, and float on the water in Hong Kong. —TYC (talk) 03:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now: While it’s still very early to say if this will receive ongoing coverage, I think it’s probably worth keeping it up for now, but to wait and see if ongoing coverage continues. While news outlets are definitely talking about it a lot, and it could be said to be rather unusual given the aircraft involved, its location, and the ground fatalities, it is a cargo flight accident without many other things that make it particularly unique.–BrayLockBoy (talk) 04:31, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Two fatalities and a hull loss. This definitely notable. NVS3992 (talk) 05:38, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]