From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|
*”’Delete”’ per nom. – [[User:Roxy the dog|”’Walter”’ ]] [[User talk:Roxy the dog|”’Ego”’]] 06:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC) |
*”’Delete”’ per nom. – [[User:Roxy the dog|”’Walter”’ ]] [[User talk:Roxy the dog|”’Ego”’]] 06:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
*”’Keep”’. I agree that the current content of the article fits [[WP:NOTDICT]]. But sufficient sources exist to have the topic (the word and the cultural phenomon) meet [[WP:WORDISSUBJECT]]. For example, there is the book ”Gezellig! Hoe typisch Nederlands is gezelligheid?”. [[User:Dajasj|Dajasj]] ([[User talk:Dajasj|talk]]) 08:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC) |
*”’Keep”’. I agree that the current content of the article fits [[WP:NOTDICT]]. But sufficient sources exist to have the topic (the word and the cultural phenomon) meet [[WP:WORDISSUBJECT]]. For example, there is the book ”Gezellig! Hoe typisch Nederlands is gezelligheid?”. [[User:Dajasj|Dajasj]] ([[User talk:Dajasj|talk]]) 08:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
*:… but this is the english language wikipedia. – [[User:Roxy the dog|”’Walter”’ ]] [[User talk:Roxy the dog|”’Ego”’]] 08:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:52, 3 January 2026
- Gezelligheid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Textbook case of WP:NOTDICT. The article consists of definitions, etymology, usage, and similar words, all precisely standard dictionary fare. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 20:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep, per original discussion. Anyone who’s been in The Netherlands would’ve heard this word repeatedly. The article provides ample context beyond what a dictionary would, and I remind folks that this being en.wikipedia does not mean we should be English-centric. PK650 (talk) 22:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- The original discussion resulted in a delete; the article was then recreated about 2 weeks later. Being a word one would hear repeatedly hardly makes it deserving of an article. I saw “uitgang” all over the place during my short trip there, but we don’t have an article for that. Moreover, I’m a little offended at the insinuation that this had anything to do with the entry being in a language other than English. I have !voted to delete (and nominated for deletion) articles about English words of the same sort in the past. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. – Walter Ego 06:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree that the current content of the article fits WP:NOTDICT. But sufficient sources exist to have the topic (the word and the cultural phenomon) meet WP:WORDISSUBJECT. For example, there is the book Gezellig! Hoe typisch Nederlands is gezelligheid?. Dajasj (talk) 08:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- … but this is the english language wikipedia. – Walter Ego 08:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
