Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Warford: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 10: Line 10:

”’Delete”’ as per above. [[User:Dagoofybloke|<span style=”font-style:italic; font-weight:600; color:#b3003b;”>Dagoofybloke</span>]] ([[User talk:Dagoofybloke|🥀]]) 13:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

”’Delete”’ as per above. [[User:Dagoofybloke|<span style=”font-style:italic; font-weight:600; color:#b3003b;”>Dagoofybloke</span>]] ([[User talk:Dagoofybloke|🥀]]) 13:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

*”’Delete”’ – at least 10 out of 11 sources are ”by” the subject, but not ”about” the subject. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:34, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

*”’Delete”’ – at least 10 out of 11 sources are ”by” the subject, but not ”about” the subject. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:34, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

*”’Delete”’ I couldn’t find any decent secondary sources and it fails [[WP:GNG]] [[User:Agnieszka653|Agnieszka653]] ([[User talk:Agnieszka653|talk]]) 17:54, 24 October 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 17:54, 24 October 2025

Mark Warford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero third-party sources to establish WP:NAUTHOR, likely WP:COI (the only editor who’s added significant content denies a COI despite uploading a photo portrait of the subject claimed as “own work.”)OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. Dagoofybloke (🥀) 13:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version