From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
 |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Oxford Science Studies}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Oxford Science Studies}}) |
||
|
[[WP:BEFORE]] done, and it would appear to me that is a [[WP:ROTM|run of the mill]] [[Coaching#In_education|student coaching]] business. Given the article was created 2 Feb 2026 and mostly relies citations from 2009 and 2010, it would appear that its [[WP:TOOSOON]] is too late a number of years ago. The phasing “OXSS is widely considered in the UK as a key authority on revision, with national coverage in newspapers, offering revision advice and guidance” looks to me hella hinkey [[Wikipedia:AISIGNS]]. That said, it would appear that this article fails any number of tests for notability, including but not limited to [[WP:GNG]], [[WP:NHSCHOOL]] and [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. As always, please do prove me wrong about this. [[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 🦘 10:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |
[[WP:BEFORE]] done, and it would appear to me that is a [[WP:ROTM|run of the mill]] [[Coaching#In_education|student coaching]] business. Given the article was created 2 Feb 2026 and mostly relies citations from 2009 and 2010, it would appear that its [[WP:TOOSOON]] is too late a number of years ago. The phasing “OXSS is widely considered in the UK as a key authority on revision, with national coverage in newspapers, offering revision advice and guidance” looks to me hella hinkey [[Wikipedia:AISIGNS]]. That said, it would appear that this article fails any number of tests for notability, including but not limited to [[WP:GNG]], [[WP:NHSCHOOL]] and [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. As always, please do prove me wrong about this. [[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 🦘 10:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
:The entry includes, in equal measures, references to older news articles (2009 and 2010) and recent news articles (2022, and two from 2025) to demonstrate that it is not a ‘ is a run of the mill student coaching business’. [[User:SchoolViewer|SchoolViewer]] ([[User talk:SchoolViewer|talk]]) 11:16, 2 February 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:16, 2 February 2026
- Oxford Science Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BEFORE done, and it would appear to me that is a run of the mill student coaching business. Given the article was created 2 Feb 2026 and mostly relies citations from 2009 and 2010, it would appear that its WP:TOOSOON is too late a number of years ago. The phasing “OXSS is widely considered in the UK as a key authority on revision, with national coverage in newspapers, offering revision advice and guidance” looks to me hella hinkey Wikipedia:AISIGNS. That said, it would appear that this article fails any number of tests for notability, including but not limited to WP:GNG, WP:NHSCHOOL and WP:CORPDEPTH. As always, please do prove me wrong about this. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- The entry includes, in equal measures, references to older news articles (2009 and 2010) and recent news articles (2022, and two from 2025) to demonstrate that it is not a ‘ is a run of the mill student coaching business’. SchoolViewer (talk) 11:16, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
