From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|
:<div class=”xfd_relist” style=”margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;”><span style=”color: #FF6600;”>”'{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}”'</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style=”color:#000000″>✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style=”color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%”>plicit</span>]] 11:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)</small><!– from Template:XfD relist –><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Oxx]]</noinclude></div> |
:<div class=”xfd_relist” style=”margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;”><span style=”color: #FF6600;”>”'{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}”'</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style=”color:#000000″>✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style=”color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%”>plicit</span>]] 11:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)</small><!– from Template:XfD relist –><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Oxx]]</noinclude></div> |
||
|
:”’Delete ”’per nom. [[User:Tioaeu8943|Tioaeu8943]] ([[User talk:Tioaeu8943|talk]]) 14:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC) |
:”’Delete ”’per nom. [[User:Tioaeu8943|Tioaeu8943]] ([[User talk:Tioaeu8943|talk]]) 14:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
* ”’Delete”’: All sources are routine announcements about funding rounds or are not substantial coverage (company profiles, lists of board members/chairs). — [[User:Reconrabbit|<span style=”color:#4E8321″>Recon</span>]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|<span class=”skin-invert” style=”color:#073131″>rabbit</span>]] 15:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC) <!–VCB Reconrabbit–> |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 13 November 2025
- Oxx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:PROMO and WP:NCORP. None of the sources satisfy the standards of WP:ORGTRIV. Most are primary or not reliable (i.e. WP:FORBESCON). Niafied (talk) 05:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – I see the concern, but if you look at the sources of some of the other Wikipedia articles on venture capital firms, they do tend to be from tech media publications or similar (Tech.eu, TechCrunch etc.) and most of the information in the articles relates to funding rounds which the venture capital firm either raised or contributed to. I would claim that is just the nature of the business and where the most important information on venture capital firms can be found. Some examples: Acton Capital, Newfund, Iris Capital, and many more at List of venture capital firms. Commissaress (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument for keeping the page. Plenty of venture capital firms do get signficant coverage in reliable pages. If there are other pages that don’t meet those standards, they will likely be nominated for deletion eventually. Since you’re being paid for your contributions, you might find it difficult to objectively assess the company’s notability. Niafied (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 14:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
