Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewari metal work: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

 

Line 12: Line 12:

*”’Delete”’ – Per total lack of [[WP:V]]. [[User:Svartner|Svartner]] ([[User talk:Svartner|talk]]) 12:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

*”’Delete”’ – Per total lack of [[WP:V]]. [[User:Svartner|Svartner]] ([[User talk:Svartner|talk]]) 12:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

*”’Delete”’ I’ve found a source [https://www.rewarionline.in/guide/metal-works-industries-in-rewari here] which much of the article content appears to have been copied from word-for-word, but given that the source is ‘rewarionline’ I don’t think it’s suitably [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent of the subject.]] I do think there ”might” be potential notability here in non-online sources, but in any case the article as it stands is wholly unfit to be a wikipedia article and TNTing the thing and starting over would be better anyway. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 13:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

*”’Delete”’ I’ve found a source [https://www.rewarionline.in/guide/metal-works-industries-in-rewari here] which much of the article content appears to have been copied from word-for-word, but given that the source is ‘rewarionline’ I don’t think it’s suitably [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent of the subject.]] I do think there ”might” be potential notability here in non-online sources, but in any case the article as it stands is wholly unfit to be a wikipedia article and TNTing the thing and starting over would be better anyway. [[User:Athanelar|Athanelar]] ([[User talk:Athanelar|talk]]) 13:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

*”’Delete”’ as per above. [[User:Fade258|Fade258]] ([[User talk:Fade258|talk]]) 13:33, 16 November 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 13:33, 16 November 2025

Rewari metal work (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic may lack WP:NOTABILITY and is in a perpetual state of lacking WP:VERIFIABILITY through WP:CITATIONS. There is a risk of significant WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH. BlockArranger (talk) 00:27, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version