From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|
:::That’s annoying, @[[User:Wikishovel|Wikishovel]]. Oh well, here we are! Best [[User:Alexandermcnabb|Alexandermcnabb]] ([[User talk:Alexandermcnabb|talk]]) 07:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC) |
:::That’s annoying, @[[User:Wikishovel|Wikishovel]]. Oh well, here we are! Best [[User:Alexandermcnabb|Alexandermcnabb]] ([[User talk:Alexandermcnabb|talk]]) 07:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:*”’Speedy Delete”’. I support speedy G4. I was sure there are sources but all appeared to be trade press releases. –[[User:Moem-Meom|Moem-Meom]] ([[User talk:Moem-Meom|talk]]) 09:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC) |
:*”’Speedy Delete”’. I support speedy G4. I was sure there are sources but all appeared to be trade press releases. –[[User:Moem-Meom|Moem-Meom]] ([[User talk:Moem-Meom|talk]]) 09:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:*”’Delete”’ – While I worry we’re being a little discriminatory against Middle Eastern retailers, there’s no doubt that the sources used are really desperate and sketchy. – [[User:Screwdryver|Screwdryver]] ([[User talk:Screwdryver|talk]]) 04:38, 19 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:39, 19 November 2025
- V Perfumes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No more notable now than at the last AFD two months ago. Per last deletion rationale: No evidence of notability for this perfume chain. Refs are all press releases, paid ads, and/or AI slop.
Article is nearly identical to the last version, but with two new paid placement “references”:
A WP:BEFORE search turned up a dozen more similar puff pieces, with no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources per WP:CORP. Wikishovel (talk) 17:38, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom aesurias (talk) 21:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
-
- Agreed: I did nominate it for G4, and the speedy was declined by a non-admin editor [1], with a cryptic edit summary. Wikishovel (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- That’s annoying, @Wikishovel. Oh well, here we are! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed: I did nominate it for G4, and the speedy was declined by a non-admin editor [1], with a cryptic edit summary. Wikishovel (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
