From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|
:”’Overturn”’ as one of the authors of the BFDI essay. The draft contains multiple independent, reliable sources, and the fact that a non-stub draft can be derived from the cited sources indicate significant coverage, satisfying [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Ca|Ca]] <i><sup style=”display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;”>[[User talk:Ca|talk to me!]]</sup></i> 14:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC) |
:”’Overturn”’ as one of the authors of the BFDI essay. The draft contains multiple independent, reliable sources, and the fact that a non-stub draft can be derived from the cited sources indicate significant coverage, satisfying [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Ca|Ca]] <i><sup style=”display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;”>[[User talk:Ca|talk to me!]]</sup></i> 14:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*”’Overturn”’, sources are good enough in context. [[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|Gråbergs Gråa Sång]] ([[User talk:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|talk]]) 15:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 25 October 2025
This topic is listed at WP:DEEPER. However, since the last DRV in August 2024, new sources about the web series have appeared:
- “‘BFDI’: Online series continues to soar“, from The Citizen, 19 June 2025
- “jacknjellify“, from Plugged In, 22 August 2025
- “Michael Huang hopes theatrical release will help Battle for Dream Island expand its huge YouTube audience“, from Comics Beat, October 21, 2025
- “What Are Object Shows And Why Is Gen-Alpha Obsessed With Them?“, from /Film, October 23, 2025
These sources have been discussed at Wikipedia talk:Why is BFDI not on Wikipedia? and added to Wikipedia:Source assessment/Battle for Dream Island as potential contenders for reliable independent significant coverage of the series. They are currently cited on a draft article, Draft:Battle for Dream Island. The Comics Beat source is being discussed here (permalink), and there seems to be some agreement that its coverage is partially significant given its interview nature, but after the release of the /Film source, editors have called for a new DRV in the essay talk page.
The page is currently salted and in the title blacklist; the salting administrator has indicated here (permalink) to start a DRV. So, as per WP:DRVPURPOSE #5, I’m requesting a review of these sources to determine this topic’s notability. ObserveOwl (talk) 13:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Overturn as one of the authors of the BFDI essay. The draft contains multiple independent, reliable sources, and the fact that a non-stub draft can be derived from the cited sources indicate significant coverage, satisfying WP:GNG. Ca talk to me! 14:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
