Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Shaktism/1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 10: Line 10:

:I am done here with the concerns noted here. [[User:Asteramellus|Asteramellus]] ([[User talk:Asteramellus|talk]]) 00:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

:I am done here with the concerns noted here. [[User:Asteramellus|Asteramellus]] ([[User talk:Asteramellus|talk]]) 00:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:Z1720|Z1720]] Thoughts? [[User:Tarlby|<span style=”background-color:black;color:cyan;font-family:Comic Sans MS;”>”Tarlby”</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Tarlby|”t”]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Tarlby|”c”]])</sup> 18:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:Z1720|Z1720]] Thoughts? [[User:Tarlby|<span style=”background-color:black;color:cyan;font-family:Comic Sans MS;”>”Tarlby”</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Tarlby|”t”]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Tarlby|”c”]])</sup> 18:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

::*{{re|Asteramellus|Tarlby}} ”’Keep”’. Sorry for the delay in responding. Citation concerns are resolved. The Vasant section looks like it has a little info, so I think its fine. No other concerns to note. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 21:57, 2 November 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 21:57, 2 November 2025

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result pending

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs and the “Vasant Panchami” section (which also looks underdeveloped). Z1720 (talk) 00:41, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720 I can help with this. Asteramellus (talk) 01:20, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Asteramellus. Yes, you can help out there. Fade258 (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just want to give a quick update here – I fixed some of the uncited statements, and have tried fixing other areas. Will find sources and look into developing “Vasant Panchami” section next. Asteramellus (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am done here with the concerns noted here. Asteramellus (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Z1720 Thoughts? Tarlby (t) (c) 18:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version