From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|
* ”’Delete”’ per Alalch E. I don’t necessary think deleting is easier than adding a template, but at the same time the fact that nobody has even noticed that these pages were broken for years is clear enough evidence of their uselessness. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style=”color:#800000″>it has begun…</sub>]] 06:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC) |
* ”’Delete”’ per Alalch E. I don’t necessary think deleting is easier than adding a template, but at the same time the fact that nobody has even noticed that these pages were broken for years is clear enough evidence of their uselessness. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style=”color:#800000″>it has begun…</sub>]] 06:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
*”’Keep”’ per Rhododendrites. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 03:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC) |
*”’Keep”’ per Rhododendrites. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 03:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
*”’Keep:”’ The original bot issue have been fixed. I don’t see the benefit of deleting this page, and there is at least a possible benefit of keeping it. It serves as a possible inspiration for the creation of other articles that would help counter our [[wp:systemic bias|systemic bias]]. If even one article gets created because someone saw this page, I would consider it worth keeping. Maybe the real problem is that these kinds of pages aren’t advertised widely enough. [[User:Chess enjoyer|Chess enjoyer]] ([[User talk:Chess enjoyer|talk]]) 04:51, 22 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:51, 22 January 2026
Only created in October and already 1.2Mb, as every few days nearly the same 80K is added at the end. Completely useless accumulation of data Fram (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep, easy fix – Would’ve been helpful if all these identical nominations would just be bundled together (or, really, absent any valid deletion rationale, just withdrawn), but see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Equity lists/Nationality/Seychelles for the discussion. A bunch of people forgot the closing tag, making the bot append rather than update the list. Whether the bot should stop running on some of these pages is not a matter for MfD. As it stands, these are pretty typical Wikidata-based lists, built either to explore content gaps or for personal curiosity about topics, and not meeting any of the criteria for deletion. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Even if the growth bug is fixed, it still is a page that isn’t used (or else the bug would have been spotted a long time ago) but requires regular bot edits. There is no reason to keep such pages around. If it can be changed to be bot-populated on manual request only, i.e. when the page creator really wants to look at it, then a case for keeping them might be made. Fram (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, the identifier of a suitably straightforward fix — an easy fix. Any subsequent purported easy fix is already less easy by virtue of an easy fix having been put forward and requiring less explanation.—Alalch E. 16:15, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per Alalch E. I don’t necessary think deleting is easier than adding a template, but at the same time the fact that nobody has even noticed that these pages were broken for years is clear enough evidence of their uselessness. * Pppery * it has begun… 06:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per Rhododendrites. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep: The original bot issue have been fixed. I don’t see the benefit of deleting this page, and there is at least a possible benefit of keeping it. It serves as a possible inspiration for the creation of other articles that would help counter our systemic bias. If even one article gets created because someone saw this page, I would consider it worth keeping. Maybe the real problem is that these kinds of pages aren’t advertised widely enough. Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:51, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
