From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|
* Double-checking for Proper Nouns—I saw more than a few terms that should have been lowercase |
* Double-checking for Proper Nouns—I saw more than a few terms that should have been lowercase |
||
|
* Every entry should have a reference and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources|reliable, secondary sources]] (e.g., newspapers and magazines) are the best sources, as they have no affiliation with the frat |
* Every entry should have a reference and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources|reliable, secondary sources]] (e.g., newspapers and magazines) are the best sources, as they have no affiliation with the frat |
||
|
<small>(not [[Help:Watchlist|watching]], please {{tl|ping}} |
<small>(not [[Help:Watchlist|watching]], please {{tl|ping}})</small> <span style=”background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px”>[[User talk:Czar|<span style=”font:bold small-caps 1.2em Avenir;color:#B048B5″>czar</span>]]</span> 04:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 10:07, 14 September 2025
I’ve listed this article for peer review for helpful feedback on making it a featured list. I’m still somewhat new to Wikipedia and have been working on this list for the past month or so, and I would like this page to be my first major contribution on improving a list to featured status. Some of my particular concerns are:
– Is it necessary to have any person have a reference? www.tke.org has a page with a lot of the distinguished alumni if it’s necessary to fill most of the entries but I have avoided that reference and have stuck to more specific references.
– Does my lead need to be longer? I can copy a lot of the Tau Kappa Epsilon page information over, but I avoided it because of duplicate information.
– Are the category headers good headers?
Let me know what I need to do to fix the article for featured list nomination.
Thanks, Jmnbqb (talk) 04:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC) jmnbqb (December 20, 2017)
Featured lists aren’t exactly my area but I’d still recommend
- Expanding the lede to summarize the list’s contents. Perhaps a bit on what areas have the greatest representation, any connections between the figures or major class years or colleges in common. Don’t duplicate content from the main page but give an overview of the group of alumni.
- Double-checking for Proper Nouns—I saw more than a few terms that should have been lowercase
- Every entry should have a reference and reliable, secondary sources (e.g., newspapers and magazines) are the best sources, as they have no affiliation with the frat
(not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 04:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
