Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

Line 24: Line 24:

”’Temporary semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Persistent vandalism since September 20, disruptive edits are expected due to the [[Flood control projects controversy in the Philippines]]. [[User:Hariboneagle927|Hariboneagle927]] ([[User talk:Hariboneagle927|talk]]) 14:43, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

*”’Automated comment:”’ A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last [[WP:RFPPA|8 days]].—[[User:Cyberbot I|cyberbot I]][[User talk:Cyberbot I|Talk to my owner]]:Online 14:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

*:As per [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] “Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It appears to have stopped two days ago. Please re-report if it resumes.”. And indeed it resumed. [[User:Hariboneagle927|Hariboneagle927]] ([[User talk:Hariboneagle927|talk]]) 09:16, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

=== [[:Zaldy Co]] ===

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: previously fully protected for edit warring, protection expired. I tagged some statements using new guidance from the thread at WP:RSN. Edit warring then presumed. I request protection and restoration to previous consensus version 1312602839 which is by an editor not involved in the edit warring. Czarking0 (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Czarking0 – I don’t see where edit warring is continuing to occur at the moment. Can you provide me with diffs that show me where? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:58, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, between the same two editors that lead to protection last time you have these diffs of me adding flags. And then this which reverts those diffs. Also since one week did not resolve the edit war I suggest 2 weeks or one month. Czarking0 (talk) 22:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. Ip says: Work Better yes. (talk) 11:19, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by the sockfarm User:Wikiravidas on this article as well as Shri Guru Ravidas Janam Asthan and Ravidas, hence requesting ECP on these three articles. Note that the recent socks seem to be the ID Zekerumor and the IP 211.30.58.152. SPI cases – [1] and [2]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:00, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since September 20, disruptive edits are expected due to the Flood control projects controversy in the Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to Flood control projects controversy in the Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users are often removing/changing the coat of arms picture in infobox. Also lots of persistent blanking. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 23:11, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 01:16, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ECP might be better, that is what Charlie Kirk has. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:01, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A lot of vandalism/reverts are coming from unregistered users, ECP seems too much for something semi-protection fulfills. X2step (talk) 03:39, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of IP vandalism. Amigao (talk) 01:29, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary full-protection – Edit warring over an infobox image. I will be starting a discussion on the picture shortly. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 02:58, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: important information Xp enter49 (talk) 04:25, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:05, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse/socking. ConnerTT (talk) 06:30, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 06:50, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:16, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Labubu vandal. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 07:12, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:19, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Following the latest US political twist, disruption has started and semi’ing this for a while will help. Bon courage (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:25, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Media Mender (talk) 08:32, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A number of reverts by multiple users. Mostly edits by anonymous IP addresses. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 08:38, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a Thai anonymous user with a dynamic IP. They are either swapping the symbols with the Axis-affiliated Second Philippine Republic with the Allies-aligned Philippine Commonwealth or worse swapping in historic Mandaluyong City seal as the country coat of arms. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:13, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply