Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

 

Line 87: Line 87:

”’Temporary semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Vandalism I don’t really understand on a new article. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 08:41, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

”’Temporary semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Vandalism I don’t really understand on a new article. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 08:41, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

=== [[:Talk:Text-to-video model]] ===

* {{pagelinks|1=Talk:Text-to-video model}}

”’Indefinite semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – Almost nothing but disruption over the past few months. [[User:Sugar Tax|Sugar Tax]] ([[User talk:Sugar Tax|talk]]) 08:58, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targeted by a TA-hopping vandal over the past few days. Could probably also use a revdelete, given the content of the vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Blocked latest account; I’d like to gather some more IP ranges before protecting. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:59, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:07, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits at all in 2 weeks. * Pppery * _{it has begun…} 04:33, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing edit dispute discussed at Talk:Vasant Panchami Mariyam-PK (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption resumed immediately after protection expired. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This looks more like an editing dispute rather than vandalism Trade (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 03:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent anon vandalism. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 03:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Tons of reverts since Super Bowl began. EaglesFan37 (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting full protection for two weeks. Given involved editors other types are inappropriate. Approaching EW due to factual and sourcing dispute. One editor has been accused of COI but is also the only one providing sources to support their argument. See also Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Gülen movement Czarking0 (talk) 04:44, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LOUTSOCK edit warring to remove sourced content based on opinionated dispute. ~ oklopfer (💬) 04:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article authors regularly has to revert edits from both anonymous users and new accounts that either add fan theories or make humorous edits. For example, an anonymous user’s recent attempts to change the gender of a non-binary character to female due to a popular fan theory that they are a closeted trans woman. Solaire the knight (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:INAPPNOTE from a Reddit post ([1]), with many disruptive edits from TAs in the AFD that seem to have came from said Reddit post. Ditto for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Visoski and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Indyke. dot.py 06:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A COI editor is edit warring and refuses to talk about it. — Melchior2006 (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting semi-protection or pending changes, whichever is deemed appropriate.
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content by IPs and new users, requiring frequent reverts.
Evidence:

Omnivoid 💬 07:45, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Recently deleted BLP – Deceased person’s Wikipedia username. See references at Chip Berlet. Ahri Boy (talk) 07:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Deceased person’s Wikipedia username. See references at Chip Berlet. Ahri Boy (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism I don’t really understand on a new article. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Almost nothing but disruption over the past few months. Sugar Tax (talk) 08:58, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]