Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

Line 208: Line 208:

* {{pagelinks|Illam}}

”’Indefinite extended-confirmed protection”’: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for [[Illam]] caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement ([[WP:CT/SASG]], [[WP:CT/CASTE]]). [[User:Taliparamba|Taliparamba]] ([[User talk:Taliparamba|talk]]) 06:48, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

=== [[:Sporting Delhi]] ===

* {{pagelinks|1=Sporting Delhi}}

”’Temporary semi-protection:”’ Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Yesterday, it was declined because there was no moves. But as soon as the request was declined, the same user moved the page twice. This user is simply vandalising. Total wastage of time for us who maintain Indian football related articles. Kindly, put a page protection. [[User:Drat8sub|Drat8sub]] ([[User talk:Drat8sub|talk]]) 07:22, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced puffery to the lede. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 13:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4000:0:0:0:0:0:0/22 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Talk:Harare#Heads up. Weird posters might alter this page; prediction seems to have come true Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The two edits nearly 24 hours ago seem to have been all so far. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Vandalism DudeJay17 (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits, period, in 10 days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:12, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Capankajsmilyo (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Added article to those this range is blocked from. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by a Mexican IP-hopper vandal. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 01:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are talking about this range? Can you explain how the edits are disruptive? It’s not clear to me. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:00, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They always deliberately update stats in parts, confusing other editors. Also when pointed out their mistakes, they gaslighted me and erased my mild warning even in another IP talk page they used. See here and here, proving this Mexican is an IP-hopper. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 187.184.4.0/22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. There are enough problematic edits from this range over the last couple of months to justify it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 114.4.83.0 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 114.4.83.0 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 114.4.83.0 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:02, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 114.4.83.0 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. per WP:GS/KURD Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 04:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is about the broader worldwide war against the Islamic State, not the specific conflict in the Kurdistan area. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. per WP:CT/PIA and ARBPIA along with the Arab-Israeli conflict Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 05:32, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don’t really see this article falling within the scope of PIA. Yes, it mentions Israel expanding its longstanding occupation of the Golan Heights. But that is largely about the only conflict involving Israel which doesn’t really have a Palestinian dimension. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – So many edits reverted lately. George Ho (talk) 06:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disrputive edits (in likely violation of both WP:RS and WP:OR), even after the user in question received a warning last month. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. If you’re not going to keep escalating warnings, don’t be surprised when they keep doing this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism by a Marxist IP from Laos. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 07:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just that recent one. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Anon vandalism and throwaway sock accounts of Sahilsambyal. Wikishovel (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All recent socks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users disruptively reverting previous edits without valid reasons. Hlfxcuc (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All of them. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated edits from Sahilsambyal sockpuppets. Ravensfire (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All recent socks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ConnerTT (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 76.9.206.106 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 3 years. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 20:04, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only two IPs made disruptive edits in the article since November 2024, I don’t think it needs protection. (The user who made the request means well, but might be a bit over-enthusiastic. 😃). — Chrisahn (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 31.166.27.54 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Quinlan. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. I should’ve expected it. It’s not even funny anymore. monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 20:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent addition of unsourced and irrelevant content by unknown IPs. MNWiki845 (talk) 22:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing much of this in the recent history. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The person overseeing the Department of Defense is still technically the Secretary of Defense. While “Secretary of War” is an approved title, by law it is still “Secretary of Defense.” Any changes to this should reflect consensus.

As peole keep changing it, this page should be at a higher level of protection to prevent vandalism. Jwilli39 (talk) ⚡ 23:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I am proposing the protection level be raised to Extended-confirmed (WP:30/500). Jwilli39 (talk) ⚡ 23:04, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing much in the way of recent reverts. Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP continues to vandalise the Player records section without comment (also mentioned within the Talk page a year ago). Protection would deter this behaviour! Statattack (talk) 23:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and/or addition of unsourced controversial claims about a BLP. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most of the recent edits seem constructive or intended that way. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IPs immediately resumed edit warring after the expiration of 3-month semi-protection. This is the second time they’ve done so as soon as semi-protection expired, so I feel that longer or indefinite semi-protection is needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:45, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not seeing how the two IPs have been edit warring. They do not appear to have reverted each other. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 172.58.183.33 (talk) 03:53, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Cacamilapoopy (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: possible increased amounts of IP editing as well as reverting past edits from users… VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 04:04, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And today’s big revert of an IP was, it turns out, a mistake. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Tharavad caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement (WP:CT/SASG, WP:CT/CASTE). The page has a very long history of being edited by socks, and reverted after they are banned. Taliparamba (talk) 06:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Illam caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement (WP:CT/SASG, WP:CT/CASTE). Taliparamba (talk) 06:48, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yesterday, it was declined because there was no moves. But as soon as the request was declined, the same user moved the page twice. This user is simply vandalising. Total wastage of time for us who maintain Indian football related articles. Kindly, put a page protection. Drat8sub (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment