Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

Line 164: Line 164:

=== [[:Draft:Tareq Amin]] ===

* {{pagelinks|1=Draft:Tareq Amin}}

* [[wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2025/10%23Tariq_Amin|Relared RPP prior request (result: ECP until November 12, 2025)]]

”’Temporary semi confirmed protection:”’ Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – I created this draft in order to remedy two [[WP:HIJACK|hijackings]] at [[Tariq Amin]]. The hijackings involved some socking ([[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Not Your Device/Archive|investigation page]]). Since drafting, and despite noted deficiencies, it was submitted twice to [[WP:AFC]] (I declined both times as unimproved). AFC submission without improvement in this case by a noob and an ip are disruptive and look like a continuation of the trash quality edits promoting this subject. I don’t foresee an end, but let’s start with temporary protection. Unless it’s clearly a permanent issue to someone. [[User:JFHJr|JFHJr]] ([[User talk:JFHJr|㊟]]) 03:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Tharavad caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement (WP:CT/SASG, WP:CT/CASTE). The page has a very long history of being edited by socks, and reverted after they are banned. Taliparamba (talk) 06:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Illam caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement (WP:CT/SASG, WP:CT/CASTE). Taliparamba (talk) 06:48, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article uses British spelling, but IP editors change “tyre” to “tire” every few days or weeks and I’m frankly tired (tyred?) of having to revert that again and again. Registered editors can learn, but unregistered ones presumably cannot (because they may always be different ones), hence the need for protection. Gawaon (talk) 07:34, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gawaon Since this is an long-term issue and there also seem to be constructive IP edits, I’d like to avoid semiprotection for prolonged periods. I’ve added an editnotice to the page, maybe that will help. You can see the editnotice when you edit the page. How about we give it a few weeks and you keep an eye on things to see if it helps? Toadspike [Talk] 09:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right, we can try that, thanks! Gawaon (talk) 10:28, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Thampan caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement (WP:CT/SASG, WP:CT/CASTE). Taliparamba (talk) 08:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Adiyodi caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement (WP:CT/SASG, WP:CT/CASTE). Taliparamba (talk) 08:18, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Request Extended Confirmed Protection (ECP) for Madampi (Nair title) caste page, by Contentious topics: Arbitration enforcement (WP:CT/SASG, WP:CT/CASTE). Taliparamba (talk) 08:20, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced, sensational, and non-neutral content since 4 October 2025. I restored the 3 October 2025 version, which was fully sourced and neutral. The article’s Talk page includes detailed notes and reasoning for edits; however, subsequent edits have ignored the discussion and reintroduced falsehoods and biased tone.

Requesting semi-protection or pending changes level 1 to maintain stability and ensure only sourced, encyclopedic content is added going forward. Please see the edit history between 3–21 October 2025 for evidence of disruptive editing. SatyamevJ (talk) 08:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism and article is about a controversial subject that will likely continue to face vandalism into the near future. Requesting semi-protection.
PortlandSaint (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Zuck28 (talk) 12:33, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DB1729^talk 12:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups, articles related to South Asian social group require ECP protection. Ixudi (talk) 13:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple users has been vandalising the page, editing the city name to it’s previous name user Rhodesian rule. Recently a user personally attacked me in the edit summary as well, so I request this page gets protected, as it seems to get vandalised quite often by trolls. Okofo (talk) 13:54, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing edit war where unregistered user using IPs from the same /64 has refused to discuss and is repeatedly trying to add the same thing and has been reverted by 2 different editors until now. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 14:53, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing IP edits change the subject’s pronouns from they/them to she/her. See also talk page where users agree on using they/them pronouns. Requesting semi-protection. Kylara (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP vandalism from multiple IPs. Was page protected previously and the day it got off of protection it was vandalized again. Most recent attempt to vandalize was yesterday. Liloobarnes (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by separate IPs. Probably the same user. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP long-term abuse/block evasion. May also need similar protection at Template:Cartoon Network original programming for the same reason. Magitroopa (talk) 16:32, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple unsourced edits. Skyshiftertalk 18:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 21:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism and unsourced changes over the last few days. Entranced98 (talk) 21:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: While the article has been “quiet” today… The matter of dispute is not “light” … It’s his unconfirmed (even denied by his son) death… I request at least a week’s verified users. No IPs. Given the seriousness of saying someone (even a 93yo) is dead. CoryGlee (talk) 22:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Could we please get talk page protection here temporarily? We are getting flooded with frivolous page move requests. Thanks. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Sadko (words are wind) 23:11, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Two reverts by one editor is not “persistent disruptive editing”. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:37, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing tony 23:21, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. CallumPaxton (talk) 23:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:30, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – massive dump into CAT:DUPARGS. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:01, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is being repeatedly targeted by off-wiki harassment and coordinated disruption following a hate campaign. Multiple bad-faith attempts have been made to delete the page, despite the subject meeting WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG with significant coverage in reliable sources including BBC, ITV, The Guardian and BASW. Requesting **semi-protection** to prevent further disruption and allow stable, neutral improvement of the article. DanielAdams75 (talk) 01:51, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. Sushidude21! (talk) 02:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. Sushidude21! (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. Sushidude21! (talk) 02:59, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I created this draft in order to remedy two hijackings at Tariq Amin. The hijackings involved some socking (investigation page). Since drafting, and despite noted deficiencies, it was submitted twice to WP:AFC (I declined both times as unimproved). AFC submission without improvement in this case by a noob and an ip are disruptive and look like a continuation of the trash quality edits promoting this subject. I don’t foresee an end, but let’s start with temporary protection. Unless it’s clearly a permanent issue to someone. JFHJr (㊟) 03:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. tony 03:28, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Quinlan. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:09, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple unexplained attempts to remove content; likely manipulated by the same person as the IP range is similar. HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 04:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Temp-blocking the range hasn’t solved this, so this page has to be added to the ever-increasing list of partial blocks, or it has to be semi-protected. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:27, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Protection declined a few days ago on the grounds that recent socks were blocked, but sock accounts are being created exclusively for this page and Thank You for Coming. Wikishovel (talk) 04:34, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Wikishovel (talk) 04:34, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment