From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
|
===10 January 2026=== |
===10 January 2026=== |
||
|
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|}} |
||
|
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
|
{{sock list|1=AugustLeon|tools_link=yes}}<!– Add more editor or temporary account usernames to this template as needed –> |
{{sock list|1=AugustLeon|tools_link=yes}}<!– Add more editor or temporary account usernames to this template as needed –> |
||
Latest revision as of 21:06, 10 January 2026
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dylam X/Archive.
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]
After being challenged on this edit, AugustLeon freely admitted on my talk page that they are Dylam X. They’ve resumed adding material from previous socks, making blocking probably the best decision. However, they seem moderately conciliatory on my talk page and have indicated that their returning to Dylam X to make an unblock request is unlikely. I don’t think they quite “get it” about why socking and their disruption is bad, but we might be able to give them the standard offer sometime in the nearish future. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- The later comments on my talk page make me a little apprehensive about this editor perhaps swinging straight to a sleeper. Requesting a CU. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
