Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kiananjomani: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 3: Line 3:

{{SPIpriorcases}}

{{SPIpriorcases}}

===08 October 2025===

===08 October 2025===

{{SPI case status|checked}}

{{SPI case status|}}

====Suspected sockpuppets====

====Suspected sockpuppets====

{{sock list|1=As the runway of the heathrow|tools_link=yes}}<!– Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed –>

{{sock list|1=As the runway of the heathrow|tools_link=yes}}<!– Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed –>

Line 19: Line 19:

*{{bnt}} [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 11:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

*{{bnt}} [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 11:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

*{{GlobalLocksRequested}} [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 11:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

*{{GlobalLocksRequested}} [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 11:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

* {{clerkrequest}} – please merge this section into [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Timelash]]. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 11:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –>

—-<!— All comments go ABOVE this line, please. –>


Latest revision as of 11:53, 9 October 2025

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kiananjomani/Archive.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.

– Clerk assistance is requested in the case below.

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

WP:DUCK. Similar edits and username, changing pictures of aircraft involved to copyrighted images that they uploaded on commons and claiming it as their own c:File:TC-JAVplanetk.jpg, cross-wiki sockpuppetry and lock evasion. Prothe1st (talk) 19:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

  • My use of CheckUser indicates the master is Timelash. Whether the 2 cases need merging, I don’t know. Looking at the archives of both cases this has happened before, and the conclusion was to keep the cases separate. PhilKnight (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There’s a sleeper:

PhilKnight (talk) 11:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top