Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sahilsambyal: Difference between revisions

Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 63: Line 63:

:Replay me you mother fuckker [[Special:Contributions/2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0|2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0]] ([[User talk:2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0|talk]]) 12:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

:Replay me you mother fuckker [[Special:Contributions/2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0|2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0]] ([[User talk:2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0|talk]]) 12:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Wikishovel|Wikishovel]] replay me mother fucker 😡😡 [[Special:Contributions/2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0|2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0]] ([[User talk:2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0|talk]]) 12:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sahilsambyal/Archive.

21 October 2025

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Loud quacking. Wikishovel (talk) 08:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same cryptic message at my user talk. Before: [1] after: [2] Wikishovel (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding anon sock 2409:40c2:39:4db1:8000::, which has just attempted to re-add Cinema History Explorer and previous socks’ reverted edits at Crew (film): [3]. Compare with Cinema History Explorer [4], [5] and Cine History Explorer [6]. Wikishovel (talk) 14:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 October 2025

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

More obvious block evasion. Film Craft Editor created four hours ago. Immediately followed blocked socks User:Cinema Chronicles and User:Cinema History Explorer‘s edits to John Arcilla [7], then re-added the sentence “The casting for Crew was handled by Al Akmar Saify” back to Crew (film) [8], though this time nested in other edits. Same account added a similar sentence about Saify to Thank You for Coming. [9]. Wikishovel (talk) 06:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And Film Craft Editor has just tried to refactor this SPI: [10] Wikishovel (talk) 06:56, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding anon sock 2409:40c2:102f:72f3:10e2:9131:8f28:1f89, further tantrum deletions of content from Crew (film), similar to blocked 2409:40C2:39:4DB1:8000:0:0:0 yesterday. Wikishovel (talk) 10:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One last note for future SPIs: the evident point of all this sockpuppetry is to get Al Akmar Saify’s name into the credits of film articles. Previous socks include User:Alakmarsaifyeditor and User:Saifyeditor, but User:Actorsaify (created 1 March 2024) so far appears to be the oldest account used, while the current master User:Sahilsambyal was created 7 October 2024. Wikishovel (talk) 12:11, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@Wikishovel Could you clarify what the issue is with my contributions? I noticed my previous messages haven’t received a response, and I’d like to understand your concerns so we can address them constructively. Film Craft Editor (talk) 06:59, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikishovel I plan to re-add the contributor’s name to the Crew (film) article. Please ensure it is not removed unless there is a verifiable, reliable source or valid reason to do so. I’d appreciate coordination to avoid unnecessary edit reversions. Film Craft Editor (talk) 07:02, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You haven’t given me any “previous messages”, unless you’re talking about the potty-mouthed tantrum you spewed at my user talk page yesterday using User:Cinema History Explorer, and then continued logged out when that account was blocked.
The issue with your contributions is misuse of multiple accounts.
It’s not about “verifiable, reliable sources”. It’s not about the quality of your current edits.
Your account was banned, and bans apply to all editing, good or bad.
You can’t simply create new accounts, over and over, thinking “they will lift the ban because my editing is good”.
If you want to be unbanned, then log back in as Sahilsambyal, and appeal the block from there.
Otherwise you’re simply wasting your time. Wikishovel (talk) 08:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikishovel first of all my name is Saify. I am not the person who owns the account Sahilsambyal. That account once appeared on my phone briefly when someone else used it, but it is not my account and I have not been operating it. I understand the seriousness of sockpuppetry accusations and I want to cooperate fully.
Explain what specific evidence links my current account to Sahilsambyal (timestamps, edits, or IP evidence) so I can respond properly. If needed, I am willing to follow the official appeal process and to provide any information that helps resolve this. Film Craft Editor (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 October 2025

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Sock mentioned above hasn’t actually been blocked yet. All the hallmarks: adding Al Akmar Saify’s name to Crew (film) [11] and Thank You for Coming [12]. Co-wrote Draft:Ashutosh Yadav with blocked sock User: Citation-PageScanner. That draft has a chequered history going back to 2020, but that’s probably a separate matter. Wikishovel (talk) 12:33, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note that the oldest identified sock so far is User:Actorsaify (created 1 March 2024), not User:Sahilsambyal, so I’d be grateful if the master could be corrected, thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 12:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replay me you mother fuckker 2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 12:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikishovel replay me mother fucker 😡😡 2409:40C2:3109:73B8:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 12:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version