From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
|
{{AfC submission|||ts=20251215170655|u=Peter.Kuntner|ns=118}} |
|||
|
{{AFC submission|d|nn|u=Peter.Kuntner|ns=118|decliner=WeirdNAnnoyed|declinets=20251212225244|ts=20251118103055}} <!– Do not remove this line! –> |
{{AFC submission|d|nn|u=Peter.Kuntner|ns=118|decliner=WeirdNAnnoyed|declinets=20251212225244|ts=20251118103055}} <!– Do not remove this line! –> |
||
|
{{AFC submission|d|essay|u=Peter.Kuntner|ns=118|decliner=Pythoncoder|declinets=20251022101228|small=yes|ts=20251021123926}} <!– Do not remove this line! –> |
{{AFC submission|d|essay|u=Peter.Kuntner|ns=118|decliner=Pythoncoder|declinets=20251022101228|small=yes|ts=20251021123926}} <!– Do not remove this line! –> |
||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
|
—- |
—- |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
|
<!– Important, do not remove anything above this line before article has been created. –> |
<!– Important, do not remove anything above this line before article has been created. –> |
||
Latest revision as of 17:06, 15 December 2025
A concept in education research
|
|
This may take 4 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 580 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. |
Where to get help
Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
|
| Declined by Tarlby 6 months ago. |
|
Comment: I think this article is non-notable per WP:DICTDEF. The sources I reviewed seem to use the term in slightly different ways, suggesting this isn’t a single cohesive topic, unless more sources could be found (ideally secondary sources as most sources cited are primary). The article also needs some general editing: Both entries in the list are numbered 1, the title of Ref. 3 is incorrect, and so on. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:52, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment: There has been little done to differentiate draft from an essay. This draft is not currently written or referenced like a Wikipedia article. Several paragraphs are also unsourced. 11WB (talk) 01:34, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Academic risk-taking, also known as intellectual risk-taking, refers to students’ willingness to engage with challenging academic tasks, even when they are uncertain about the correctness or quality of their response[1]. The risk stems from the possibility of providing an incorrect or suboptimal contribution rather than an optimal one, which could make you appear less competent compared to others.[2][3]. Examples include contributing novel ideas to class discussions, submitting creative work for feedback, or expressing dissenting viewpoints in academic debates.
Studies in educational research have identified various variables that
influence academic risk-taking:
- Individual characteristics: Student’s beliefs about errors[4], goal orientations[5], and a preference for effortful thinking[6] can affect their willingness to take academic risks. Learners with mastery-oriented goals or a positive view of mistakes are more likely to engage in challenging tasks, while those with performance-avoidant orientations tend to avoid them.
- Didactic design: Teaching methods emphasizing, memorization and rote reproduction of content, are generally associated with lower levels of academic risk-taking[7]
Academic outcomes: Academic risk-taking involves engaging with complex and challenging learning material. Based on the concept of desirable difficulties, challenging learning tasks promote long-term learning success.[8][9] Recognizing and correcting errors supports deeper knowledge integration, self-regulation, and improves learning outcomes[10]. Empirical findings have shown positive associations between academic risk-taking and academic achievement among both secondary school students[11] and university students[12].
- ^ Kelty, Ryan; Bunten, Bridget A (2017). Risk-taking in higher education: the importance of negotiating intellectual challenge in the college classroom. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield. p. xv. ISBN 978-1475832488.
- ^ Beghetto, Ronald A. (2009). “Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 46 (2): 210–223. Bibcode:2009JRScT..46..210B. doi:10.1002/tea.20270.
- ^ Abercrombie, Sara; Bang, Hyeyoung; Vaughan, Ashley (9 August 2022). “Motivational and disciplinary differences in academic risk taking in higher education”. Educational Psychology. 42 (7): 895–912. doi:10.1080/01443410.2022.2076810.
- ^ Hübner, Vanessa; Pfost, Maximilian (7 November 2022). “University students’ beliefs about errors predict their willingness to take academic risks”. Frontiers in Education. 7 992067. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.992067.
- ^ Dachner, Alison M.; Miguel, Rosanna F.; Patena, Rachel A. (June 2017). “Risky Business: Understanding Student Intellectual Risk Taking in Management Education”. Journal of Management Education. 41 (3): 415–443. doi:10.1177/1052562917695775.
- ^ Abercrombie, Sara; Carbonneau, Kira J.; Hushman, Carolyn J. (January 2022). “(Re)Examining academic risk taking: Conceptual structure, antecedents, and relationship to productive failure”. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 68 102029. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102029.
- ^ Hübner, Vanessa; Pfost, Maximilian (April 2024). “Academic risk taking and teaching quality in higher education”. Learning and Instruction. 90 101877. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101877.
- ^ Bjork, E. L.; Bjork, R. A. (2011). Gernsbacher, R. W.; Pew, L. M; Pomerantz, J. R. (eds.). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society.: Worth Publishers. pp. 56–64.
- ^ Brummet, Evan (22 January 2025). “A Guide to Intellectual Risk Taking”. Retrieved 15 December 2025.
- ^ Zhang, Qian; Fiorella, Logan (2 January 2023). “An integrated model of learning from errors”. Educational Psychologist. 58 (1): 18–34. doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2149525.
- ^ Özbay, Hatice Esma; Köksal, Mustafa Serdar (October 2021). “Middle School Students’ Scientific Epistemological Beliefs, Achievements in Science and Intellectual Risk-Taking”. Science & Education. 30 (5): 1233–1252. Bibcode:2021Sc&Ed..30.1233O. doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00217-y.
- ^ Hübner, Vanessa; Pfost, Maximilian (July 2025). “Leap, learn, earn: exploring academic risk taking and learning success across gender and socioeconomic groups”. Higher Education. 90 (1): 49–67. doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01307-w.

