Draft:Dual study program: Difference between revisions

German Dual Study Program

This may take 2–3 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 626 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Declined by Royiswariii 10 days ago. Last edited by Kokosnusspflücker 2 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Declined by MCE89 13 days ago.

• Comment: Please read before review: My submission was declines by Royiswariii. I tried to contact him on his talk page, but I did not get a reply to what is wrong with my article. Since i don’t know whats actually wrong with my article, i’ll resubmit it again and hope to receive meaningful and reasoned feedback.TL;DR of the comment I wrote to Royiswariii:Since I am not a native english speaker, I dont have a perfect professional english. Thats why I was using AI for translating purposes, so I wrote the article in german before by myself. I also used AI literature research, but only as a search engine. I read all sources by myself and ervery quote is of course source-to-text checked. The article is by no means written by AI from scratch.Original comment:“Hello Royiswariii, thanks for your review on my draft “Dual study program”. The draft “Dual study program” is my first ever wikipedia article. I think it’s important for students who want to study in German-speaking countries (especially in Germany), where dual study programs are very common, as well as for international employers who have German dual students as applicants.Since its my first article I expected that I don’t achieve article-ready quality in my first try. But all sources I placed in the article are source-to-text checked and fit to the respective text. The sources are mainly from german/european universities and information pages about the dual study program. I read all of them personally, even when I used AI to only “locate” some of those sources. Afaik its allowed to use AI to only locate sources, as long as every source is personally checked?Also your review says: “Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. ” It’s not. As I wrote in my last comment, I used AI as a professional translation tool, since i am fluent in english, but not perfect in professional writing (as you maybe see in this comment). So I wrote the text mainly in german and used AI only to translate the text and then double checked the translation. Since wikipedia has its own AI page translation tool, i dont see a problem with this procedure, as long as everything is personally checked afterwards. The article itself was by no means written from scratch by AI.I would be really happy, if you could explain to me, whats wrong with my draft”—Kokosnusspflücker (talk) 14:53, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Hi Gurkubondinn, thank you for the check. I used AI solely as a translation tool and as a search engine to locate some of the provided sources, but I have personally verified the content of the sources myself before publishing. I have now cleaned the URL parameter and removed the AI-tag. I have also double-checked that the text matches the cited reference. FYI: This article should be the english translation/version of the german article: [1] —Kokosnusspflücker (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: ChatGPT was used for at least one source. I’ve tagged the ref, but this needs to be checked for source-to-text issues. I suspect that the whole thing might be {{AI-generated}} but I haven’t looked through this thoroughly enough to tag it yet. —Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Much of the information in this draft does not seem to appear in the cited sources. It would be preferable to also add inline citations to aid in verification. MCE89 (talk) 14:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

A dual study program (German: Duales Studium) is a university degree program that combines academic studies with vocational training or work placements in a company.^[1]. Dual students typically alternate between attending a university or university of applied sciences and working at a partner company, with which they hold an employment contract ^[2].

The concept originated in Germany ^[3], where it has become a well-established model of higher education that closely links universities and industry ^[4]. It has also been adopted in several other European countries, including Austria ^[5], Switzerland
^[6], and the Netherlands ^[7], where universities and companies have introduced similar cooperative education models.

Depending on the specific program structure, graduates are awarded an academic degree ^[8] (such as a Bachelor’s or Master’s) and, in training-integrated models, a recognized vocational qualification ^[9].

In contrast to many international cooperative education models, dual study programs are characterized by a fixed rotation schedule and a binding contract with a single partner company ^[2]. Dual Students typically remain with this employer for the entire duration of their studies, ensuring that the practical work is not merely an internship ^[10], but an integral and credited component of the academic degree program ^[11]