From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
|
The type of coverage a nonviolent protest receives depends significantly on the issue being covered. <ref name=fourTypes /> |
The type of coverage a nonviolent protest receives depends significantly on the issue being covered. <ref name=fourTypes /> |
||
|
As a result of lack of coverage when protesters engage in nonviolent actions deemed “not newsworthy,” protesters are more likely to engage in violence in order to secure media attention, thereby endangering themselves. <ref name=douglas /> For example, the [[Women Against Pornography]] movement in Minneapolis was largely ignored until protesters “ransacked an adult bookstore,” anarchists in Minneapolis only received attention after demolishing a TV set and shaming a Marine recruiting station’s windows, and the [[1999 Seattle WTO protests]] only received national coverage after protesters engaged in street violence with [[riot police]]. <ref name=douglas /> These kinds of protests are |
As a result of lack of coverage when protesters engage in nonviolent actions deemed “not newsworthy,” protesters are more likely to engage in violence in order to secure media attention, thereby endangering themselves. <ref name=douglas /> For example, the [[Women Against Pornography]] movement in Minneapolis was largely ignored until protesters “ransacked an adult bookstore,” anarchists in Minneapolis only received attention after demolishing a TV set and shaming a Marine recruiting station’s windows, and the [[1999 Seattle WTO protests]] only received national coverage after protesters engaged in street violence with [[riot police]]. <ref name=douglas /> These kinds of protests are as bad news after turning violent. <ref name=douglas /> |
||
|
== Historical examples == |
== Historical examples == |
||
Revision as of 10:00, 8 October 2025
The protest paradigm refers to a set of mainstream news media coverage patterns that delegitimize and unfavorably represent protesters, instead favoring narratives by authorities.
Characteristics of the paradigm
Some characteristics of the protest paradigm include the following:
- Narrative framing: framing protesters under a pre-existing narrative, such as by using the “criminals” narrative or the “riot” narrative. [1]
- Reliance on authorities: favoring official sources and official definitions, such as by quoting police officials and policies. [1]
- Public opinion: comparing public opinion polling against issues advocated by protesters, such as by making protesters look like an “isolated minority.” [1]
- Delegitimization: failing to explain the meaning and context of protest actions in order to delegitimize them, such as through downplaying what the protests accomplish or characterizing them as ineffective. [1]
- Demonization: exaggerating threats and focusing disproportionately on the negative consequences of protests, such the effects of traffic congestion on bystanders. [1]
Coverage types
Scholars identified two dimensions of news coverage: substance (low- or high-depth of coverage of protester action and demands) and sentiment (favorable or unfavorable framing). [2]
| Unfavorable | Favorable | |
|---|---|---|
| High substance | Hard news “Repeated warnings issued to protesters for disrupting campus” |
Good news “Protesters partake in assertive political action” |
| Low substance | Bad news “Protesters on trial after controversial demonstration” |
Soft news “Protesters appear outside university” |
Good news
Good news in the United States is more likely when covering engagement in bipartisan electoral politics in the United States. [2] Good news is more likely to occur when journalists engage “deeply and frequently with a community,” and a study claims student journalism generally does this better than most mainstream media outlets. [3]
Soft news
Soft news coverage is more likely when covering civic action or third party candidates in electoral politics. [2]
Bad news and hard news
Bad news coverage is more likely when there is violence or when protesters are investigated or charged with crimes, whereas hard news coverage is more likely when there are labor strikes. [2] News outlets often focus on how radical protests violate social norms, such as through drawing attention to protesters dressing in unusual ways, violating laws, or holding minority views in public opinion polling. [1] The more radical a protest group is, the more likely they are to receive negative coverage. [1]
Nonviolent protests and lack of coverage
The type of coverage a nonviolent protest receives depends significantly on the issue being covered. [2]
As a result of lack of coverage when protesters engage in nonviolent actions deemed “not newsworthy,” protesters are more likely to engage in violence in order to secure media attention, thereby endangering themselves. [1] For example, the Women Against Pornography movement in Minneapolis was largely ignored until protesters “ransacked an adult bookstore,” anarchists in Minneapolis only received attention after demolishing a TV set and shaming a Marine recruiting station’s windows, and the 1999 Seattle WTO protests only received national coverage after protesters engaged in street violence with riot police. [1] These kinds of protests are usually covered as bad news after turning violent. [1]
Historical examples
Mahsa Amini protests
Black Lives Matter protests
Gaza war protests
Great American Boycott
News coverage of the 2006 Great American Boycott (“Day Without Immigrants” demonstrations) was favorable. [1]
Temp: source sorting
Broad overview: [1] [4] [5] [2]
Gaza war: [6]
George Floyd: [3]
Mahsa Amini protests [7]
Pending email response to retrieve: https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/macp.13.1-2.131_1
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l “Journal of Dispute Resolution — PDF (article 1529)” (PDF). University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. University of Missouri School of Law. Retrieved 2025-10-07.
- ^ a b c d e f Amenta, Edwin; Caren, Neal; Yuan, Weijun (September 2024). “Beyond the protest paradigm: Four types of news coverage and America’s most prominent social movement organizations”. Sociological Forum. 39 (3): 296–309. doi:10.1111/socf.13006. Retrieved 8 October 2025.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ a b Lavery, Kevin (2024-09-25). “Brown studies the paradigm of protests and the press”. College of Communication Arts and Sciences. Michigan State University. Retrieved 2025-10-07.
- ^ Masullo, Gina M.; Brown, Danielle K.; Harlow, Summer (7 September 2023). “Shifting the protest paradigm? Legitimizing and humanizing protest coverage lead to more positive attitudes toward protest, mixed results on news credibility”. Journalism. 25 (6). doi:10.1177/14648849231200135. Retrieved 8 October 2025.
- ^ Lee, Francis L. F. (2014). “Triggering the Protest Paradigm: Examining Factors Affecting News Coverage of Protests”. International Journal of Communication. 8: 2725–2746. ISSN 1932-8036. Retrieved 8 October 2025.
- ^ Brown, Danielle K. (May 7, 2024). “‘Protest Paradigm’ Shows What’s Wrong with Media Coverage of Student Activism”. Scientific American. Retrieved October 7, 2025.
- ^ Mosallaei, Afrooz (2025) [9 April 2024]. “Protest Paradigm Revisited: Is Depicting Protestors’ (Counter)Violence Really Bad?”. Digital Journalism. 13 (1). Taylor & Francis: 159–178. doi:10.1080/21670811.2024.2329651. Retrieved 7 October 2025.
