Talk:Anarchy: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don’t take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about politics or personal points of view. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about politics or personal points of view at the Reference desk.

What exactly is the scope of this article supposed to be? The sections “anarchist movements” and “list of ungoverned communities” never mention the term “anarchy”, so a dih

t first glance appear to be entirely synthetically attached to this article. The section on “state-collapse anarchy” doesn’t appear to define such a term, or even have a source for it, so it appears to just be used synonymously with “failed state”. As for the “Overview” section, it isn’t clear how the “Anthropology” subsection relates to the concept of anarchy, and the inclusion of the “international relations” and “anarchism” sections seem to be entirely based on the relation of the two words, leaving only Kant’s definition as an actually clear fit for the article.

In its current state, I have no idea what this article’s purpose is and I’m not sure what it’s trying to communicate either. I’m even left wondering how many of the sources verifiably use the term “anarchy”. — Grnrchst (talk) 17:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Anarchy/Archive 5#Scope 🙂 czar 04:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My recommendation hasn’t changed: merge into Anarchism and move anarchy (disambiguation) to anarchy, as there is no “primary topic” for its different dictionary definitions. czar 04:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This entry seems fairly biased against anarchy and lacks much in the way of an applied understanding of the concept/outdated though foundational, and could at the very least use more contemporary examples and definitions from the late 19th century French anarchists up to modern movements and even redefinitions by Noam Chomsky, for starters. 2001:861:3D41:8B90:7C1C:440D:F559:D2CC (talk) 10:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They Wikipedia page of pure anarchy anyone is allowed to do anything in the page until it forms into something Yooyoh (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a question? Knitsey (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No just a random thought by a enlightened monk Yooyoh (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is to the exrent that this is an answer. Leutha (talk) 21:37, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]