Talk:Captain America: Brave New World: Difference between revisions

You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}} You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning { display: none; } Stop: Parts of this page are restricted Parts of this article are related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article: All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit. You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances) Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

This worth mentioning? Feige blaming Evans’ absence. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:32, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I’m a bit behind on this article otherwise I would have added it when I added his comments on Thunderbolts to that article. – adamstom97 (talk) 08:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change:
Remove “has” from “It has grossed $415.1 million worldwide” as it is no longer in theaters.

Diff:

Deadfish09 (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:08, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the plot summary, this passage is out of order:
Wilson, Torres, and Bat-Seraph go to Celestial Island where Ross and Ozaki, the Prime Minister of Japan, are racing to claim ownership of adamantium. Sterns takes control of the minds of two American pilots and makes them attack the Japanese fleet. Wilson and Torres intercept the planes and convince the Japanese to stand down, but Torres is critically injured in the fight. Ross tells Wilson that he is dying of heart failure and had Sterns develop pills that have prolonged his life; Ross refused to release Sterns for fear that he would no longer make the pills, leading to Sterns’s anger and plans for revenge.

It should be:
Wilson, Torres, and Bat-Seraph go to Celestial Island where Ross and Ozaki, the Prime Minister of Japan, are racing to claim ownership of adamantium. Ross tells Wilson that he is dying of heart failure and had Sterns develop pills that have prolonged his life; Ross refused to release Sterns for fear that he would no longer make the pills, leading to Sterns’s anger and plans for revenge. Sterns takes control of the minds of two American pilots and makes them attack the Japanese fleet. Wilson and Torres intercept the planes and convince the Japanese to stand down, but Torres is critically injured in the fight. NickH (talk) 23:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a text diff template to make it easier for people to follow the request. I know nothing about this so don’t feel comfortable implementing without a source. But if nobody does so in a couple days, ping me and I’ll take another look. meamemg (talk) 17:43, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

−

Wilson, Torres, and Bat-Seraph go to Celestial Island where Ross and Ozaki, the Prime Minister of Japan, are racing to claim ownership of adamantium. Sterns takes control of the minds of two American pilots and makes them attack the Japanese fleet. Wilson and Torres intercept the planes and convince the Japanese to stand down, but Torres is critically injured in the fight. Ross tells Wilson that he is dying of heart failure and had Sterns develop pills that have prolonged his life; Ross refused to release Sterns for fear that he would no longer make the pills, leading to Sterns’s anger and plans for revenge.

+

Wilson, Torres, and Bat-Seraph go to Celestial Island where Ross and Ozaki, the Prime Minister of Japan, are racing to claim ownership of adamantium. Ross tells Wilson that he is dying of heart failure and had Sterns develop pills that have prolonged his life; Ross refused to release Sterns for fear that he would no longer make the pills, leading to Sterns’s anger and plans for revenge.

I don’t think it is that straightforward, both of these sections have some overlap in the film. I think this way has a logical flow to it, happy to hear other opinions. – adamstom97 (talk) 16:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Two main reasons I brought it up.

1. Sam talks to Ross before the dogfight takes place. The overlap with the action scene is Ross getting called by Sterns.

2. Sam going to the hospital is a direct result of Joaquin getting hurt. Adding the Ross conversation between them actually breaks up the flow. NickH (talk) 04:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have made this update. – adamstom97 (talk) 08:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

are we seriously protecting articles just because ~10% of it is related to controversial topic?

1984 levels or censorship here ig ~2025-32887-31 (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it’s protected because part of it is intertwined with the Gaza war, most particularly the Israeli actress and the threats of boycott because of said ties. Thus, it falls under the requirements for being monitored by arbitration guidelines regarding the sensitive/contentious topic. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 23:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. The article was protected because there was excessive and persistent disruptive editing of the contentious material, and the editing restrictions were implemented as they met the Arbitration requirements. There is no “censorship”, and no point in feeding the troll. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 00:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]