From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|
There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines#Requested move 29 January 2021 |Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!– Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines crosspost –> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 18:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC) |
There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines#Requested move 29 January 2021 |Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!– Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines crosspost –> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 18:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
|
== It can amend the constitution based on necessity of the country which changes periodically == |
|||
|
Civics [[Special:Contributions/~2025-39165-50|~2025-39165-50]] ([[User talk:~2025-39165-50|talk]]) 13:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:56, 9 December 2025
This edit caught my eye. I have not reverted it, but in light of XX(368)(2) here, I’m wondering about presidential assent. It seems to me that, as it mentions nothing about that assent, the source cited is not sufficient to support an assertion that the constitution has been amended. Is this edit premature? Is a better or an additional supporting source needed? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
