Talk:Fourth Children: Difference between revisions

Line 18: Line 18:

}}

{{old move|date=5 November 2025|from=Fourth Child|destination=Fourth Children|result=moved|link=Special:Permalink/1322525192#Requested move 5 November 2025}}

== Fourth Child or Fourth Children? ==

Line 27: Line 29:

== Requested move 5 November 2025 ==

:”The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style=”color: var(–color-error, red);”>”’Please do not modify it.”'</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] ”’after”’ discussing it on the closer’s talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.”

The result of the move request was: ”’moved.”’ <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> [[User:Jeffrey34555|Jeffrey34555]] ([[User talk:Jeffrey34555|talk]]) 07:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

—-

[[:Fourth Child]] → {{no redirect|Fourth Children}} – The episode’s English title is given on-screen as “FOURTH CHILDREN” and not “FOURTH CHILD”. (see: https://svenge.evamonkey.com/evasite/titlecards/SUB17E.jpg and note 1 on [[List of Neon Genesis Evangelion episodes]]) [[User:Dvdmovies123|Dvdmovies123]] ([[User talk:Dvdmovies123|talk]]) 03:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC) <small>”This is a contested technical request” ([[Special:Permalink/1320573686#NNI|permalink]]). <span style=”padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:-1px”>[[User:CFA|<span style=color:#00c>C</span>]] <span style=color:red>F</span> [[User talk:CFA|<span style=color:#5ac18e>A</span>]]</span> 15:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)</small> <small>— ””’Relisting.””’ –[[user:pro-anti-air|<span style=”color:green;”>pro</span>-<span style=”color:red;”>anti</span>-<span style=”color:gray;”>air</span>]] ––>[[user talk:pro-anti-air|(talk)]]<–– 17:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

Line 37: Line 43:

:”’Support”’ per nom. [[User:BlookyNapsta|BlookyNapsta]] ([[User talk:BlookyNapsta|talk]]) 13:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

:”’Support”’: “Fourth Children” appears to clearly be the [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. <i style=”font-family:cursive,Serif;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px #f008;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#fb0,#f0b);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:#0000″>– [[User:LuniZunie|LuniZunie]] ツ</i><sub>([[User talk:LuniZunie|talk]])</sub> 18:51, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

<div style=”padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em”>The discussion above is closed. <b style=”color: var(–color-error, red);”>Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!– from [[Template:Archive bottom]] –>

</div><div style=”clear:both;” class=></div>

	Fourth Children has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess* it*.

Current status: Good article

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fourth Child/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 21:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 18:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll be reviewing this as part of our exchange.Tintor2 (talk) 18:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

The first sentence is kinda long as it involves three creators without attributing the what exactly what the first three did. How about using Gainax only in the first sentence and then moving to Anno and Higuchi in the second sentence.
Explain what is the Eva-04
“Hikari Horaki, class leader of Toji and Shinji’s class, asks Toji to prepare something for him to eat.” sounds kinda random unless you add some context from the staff.
Third paragraph is kinda vague. Hikari’s case is unknown.

Plot

Is the context about Hikari vague? Maybe expanding on that might help the readers understand what was the subject of critcism.

Development and writing

Are Higuchi’s previous episodes that important for the episode’s case?

Voice acting and soundtrack

It’s kinda a small section. Since these roles are not that relevant I would consider removing it unless it was a crazy case like the old series Ideon where the minor actors were fired apparently as they killed the characters due to budget reasons.

Cultural references

Explain what is Space Battleship Yamato

Reception

The second paragraph needs an introduction to the subject since it handles.
I’m not sure if scores help in describing a perception of the review so I’d recommend giving a more elaborated response for the last sentence.

@TeenAngels1234: Good work. I’ll pass it once it’s all solved.Tintor2 (talk) 19:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Hi. Thanks for the review. I think I revised everything, but the first point is still unclear to me. What do you mean? Can you suggest me how to rewrite the first sentences of the lead?–TeenAngels1234 (talk) 10:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just focus first on who created the creator and then provide another sentence to avoid it making it that long. Tintor2 (talk) 13:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it well written?

A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?

A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?

A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:

Pass or Fail:

Tintor2 (talk) 13:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’d personally go with Fourth Child, but I figured it would be better to get more opinions before moving the page or removing all instances of the word ‘children’. Pinging @Dvdmovies123: in case they want to pitch in. Great Mercian (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thought I should also ping @TeenAngels1234: since they’re pretty much responsible for all these episode articles. Great Mercian (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply