Talk:Grassroots Democratic Party of Germany: Difference between revisions

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project’s importance scale.

According to the button above, the article already contained a translation from Basisdemokratische_Partei_Deutschland. I added a new one, two sentences referring to the – by my knowledge – unique scientific article about dieBasis:
Nadine Kasten, Simon Franzmann: DieBasis: Partei der Unzufriedenen? Demokratie-Dialog, 12 pp. 23–34. doi:10.17875/gup2023-2369, 2023.

It contains much more information and should be further exploited, more than in the German version. I don’t want to do it in the next time, since – as a member of dieBasis (see my new user page) – I want to edit this article in a very reluctant way, and more by suggestions at the discussion page and further translations than by original edits. Jwollbold (talk) 20:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the box, the political position “right-wing” is not appropriate. What would you propose? Centrism, Liberalism, Civil rights, …? —Jwollbold (talk) 21:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pure Whitewashing attempt. —Denniss (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denniss, why this complete revert of private opinions without source?

• As I said on November 14, the unique characterization “right-wing” contradicts the article stub, moreover the many sources in the German article. And compare the introduction at dieBasis!
• Together with “right-wing”, I had reverted “antimilitarism”. I am judging according to objective criteria of sources, whereas it seems that you want to publish on Wikipedia your private bad opinion about the party.
• This is very obvious, when you restored the judgement spreading Russian propaganda only from a primary source. “Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation.” (WP:NOR)

Hence, please revert your unjustified reverts, and make better propositions for “policial position”. —Jwollbold (talk) 12:53, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]