*”’Support”’ as per nom ”'<span style=”color:#f535aa”>—</span> [[User:Paper9oll|<span style=”background:#f535aa;color:#fff;padding:2px;border-radius:5px”>Paper9oll</span>]] <span style=”color:#f535aa”>([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])</span>”’ 11:35, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
*”’Support”’ as per nom ”'<span style=”color:#f535aa”>—</span> [[User:Paper9oll|<span style=”background:#f535aa;color:#fff;padding:2px;border-radius:5px”>Paper9oll</span>]] <span style=”color:#f535aa”>([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])</span>”’ 11:35, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
*:is there an update for this discussion? [[User:StarEditor92|StarEditor92]] ([[User talk:StarEditor92|talk]]) 20:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
*:is there an update for this discussion? [[User:StarEditor92|StarEditor92]] ([[User talk:StarEditor92|talk]]) 20:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
*::@[[User:StarEditor92|StarEditor92]] As per the notice above, [[Wikipedia:RM|requested move discussions]] are normally open for seven days and are closed by an uninvolved editor. Since you have contributed to the article and participated in the discussion, you would be considered involved and therefore cannot close the RM or move the page yourself. Additionally, RM discussions are not forums. There is no requirement to reply to or endorse every comment or [[WP:NOTVOTE|!vote]] unless you are presenting a new argument, particularly in response to an oppose. Repeated acknowledgements do not affect consensus and are generally unnecessary. Please also be mindful of [[WP:OWN]]. Contributing to an article does not confer control over its title or outcome of a requested move, which is determined by [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]]. As such, there is no need to push for a status update; the process should be allowed to run its course. ”'<span style=”color:#f535aa”>—</span> [[User:Paper9oll|<span style=”background:#f535aa;color:#fff;padding:2px;border-radius:5px”>Paper9oll</span>]] <span style=”color:#f535aa”>([[User talk:Paper9oll|🔔]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paper9oll|📝]])</span>”’ 12:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
:I have retargeted {{no redirect|Gaeul}} to [[Ga-eul]]. If there is sufficient consensus that the singer is the primary topic for the name “Gaeul”, then the article may simply be moved to [[Gaeul]] rather than [[Gaeul (singer)]]. Until then, the status quo is that there is no primary topic. [[User:GTrang|GTrang]] ([[User talk:GTrang|talk]]) 18:06, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
:I have retargeted {{no redirect|Gaeul}} to [[Ga-eul]]. If there is sufficient consensus that the singer is the primary topic for the name “Gaeul”, then the article may simply be moved to [[Gaeul]] rather than [[Gaeul (singer)]]. Until then, the status quo is that there is no primary topic. [[User:GTrang|GTrang]] ([[User talk:GTrang|talk]]) 18:06, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
|
|||||||||
I want to change the title to Gaeul (Singer) and then submit it, but the title change permissions are unavailable. StarEditor92 (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Kim Ga-eul (singer) → Gaeul (singer) – She is known mononymously[1][2][3]. I don’t think she is the primary topic for the name, so I think Gaeul should redirect to Ga-eul, but I am open to discussing it here. As it stands she is not known by her full name so it will need to be moved. orangesclub 🍊 11:32, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per nom — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:35, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- is there an update for this discussion? StarEditor92 (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- @StarEditor92 As per the notice above, requested move discussions are normally open for seven days and are closed by an uninvolved editor. Since you have contributed to the article and participated in the discussion, you would be considered involved and therefore cannot close the RM or move the page yourself. Additionally, RM discussions are not forums. There is no requirement to reply to or endorse every comment or !vote unless you are presenting a new argument, particularly in response to an oppose. Repeated acknowledgements do not affect consensus and are generally unnecessary. Please also be mindful of WP:OWN. Contributing to an article does not confer control over its title or outcome of a requested move, which is determined by consensus. As such, there is no need to push for a status update; the process should be allowed to run its course. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- is there an update for this discussion? StarEditor92 (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- I have retargeted Gaeul to Ga-eul. If there is sufficient consensus that the singer is the primary topic for the name “Gaeul”, then the article may simply be moved to Gaeul rather than Gaeul (singer). Until then, the status quo is that there is no primary topic. GTrang (talk) 18:06, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- This is actually a very good idea thank you for your suggestion she’s indeed known for her name gaeul not her full name kim gaeul but i thought they may be an article with gaeul so i add gaeul (singer) if there’s not ill appreciate it if you can move it thank you StarEditor92 (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Support subject is not known by her full name. RachelTensions (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Support. She is known as Gaeul, not her full name. Random86 (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes i know i think it will be better to move it to Gaeul (Singer) StarEditor92 (talk) 03:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- great suggestion StarEditor92 (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC)



