Talk:Royal Rumble match: Difference between revisions

 

Line 56: Line 56:

::well bring it back [[User:Themus3600|Themus3600]] ([[User talk:Themus3600|talk]]) 20:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

::well bring it back [[User:Themus3600|Themus3600]] ([[User talk:Themus3600|talk]]) 20:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

:::No, you are being very rude and demanding. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, the “stats” as you call them were garbage dopamine addicting junk that are completely opposite as to the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia, go look on a fan wiki for them, there’s plenty out there, Wikipedia is not the place for such unencyclopedic content. [[User:Lemonademan22|Lemonademan22]] ([[User talk:Lemonademan22|talk]]) 22:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

:::No, you are being very rude and demanding. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, the “stats” as you call them were garbage dopamine addicting junk that are completely opposite as to the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia, go look on a fan wiki for them, there’s plenty out there, Wikipedia is not the place for such unencyclopedic content. [[User:Lemonademan22|Lemonademan22]] ([[User talk:Lemonademan22|talk]]) 22:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

::::The stats were facts mate dont get rude with me. They were there for for 20 years and you just got rid of them just leave them be people like reading then [[User:Themus3600|Themus3600]] ([[User talk:Themus3600|talk]]) 22:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

It looks like people are omitting record-holders, either in good faith or as I suspect for spite. Chris Jericho has the longest cumulative time in the Rumble but is not on the list. The Miz has 13 Rumble appearances but is not on the list. Also it says Brock Lesnar has 50 eliminations but is in the list sort as if he has 30. Please let’s clean up the records and be civil not to vandalize just because you do or do not like a certain wrestler. 107.217.228.177 (talk) 04:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is this consensus you mentioned Galatz? Yes, it was an “official” match, but it makes absolutely no sense to include it as it is now when it was not part of the annual event. It’s not even part of the Royal Rumble chronology. It was a completely separate event and the match had no stakes or any affect on the product thereafter (with the one exception that at the event, we got new Raw Tag Team Champions). —JDC808 ♫ 22:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m on mobile right now but I think it was at the PPV page, can look later. The reason for this page split was the break away the chronology from the match. If you want the PPV chronology look at Royal Rumble. This page shouldn’t duplicate that table. The table here should match the matches that contribute to the statistics below it, otherwise it’s very misleading. Just like how Money In The Bank match page has more matches then the PPV chronology page does. – Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 23:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i would like to see the same values added to the Women’s section for the Royal Rumble, like the men. like ‘Longest cumulative time spent in Royal Rumble’ and ‘Most Rumble appearances’. i would edit the document, but i do not know how to. Jdpastor666 (talk) 23:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Females: Longest cumulative time spent in Royal Rumbles ==

Why Females section lacks those data when one of the cited sources provides them?

• “TOP 10 WOMEN’S LONGEST CUMULATIVE TOTAL ROYAL RUMBLE TIME: Natalya (01:21:35), Ember Moon (00:58:37), Sasha Banks (00:54:46), Charlotte Flair (00:50:01), Becky Lynch (00:44:14), Nia Jax (00:29:55), Mandy Rose (00:29:42), Lacey Evans (00:29:20), Carmella (00:25:57), Ruby Riott (00:24:40)” ^link

—Wario-Man (talk) 18:18, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is this, yes?

there have been a total of 444 competitors Jeremyeyork (talk) 04:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn’t Rhea Ripley and Liv Morgan be tied for the longest time spent in a match? The match ends the second the last competitor (i.e. Liv) is eliminated so winning the match or not makes no difference to the overall time spent in the match. 2.27.219.132 (talk) 12:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where is Benoit? 2A00:23C8:3346:1201:970F:3E44:8735:C3F0 (talk) 12:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Their are a load of mistakes where it says the fastest elimination records Wwe edge (talk) 18:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There used to be very easy to read sub headings, such as royal rumble records which had very useful and handy statistics which have been removed within the last few days 128.240.225.51 (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

lemonademan has removed a load of useful info and stats that didn’t need to be removed 128.240.225.51 (talk) 08:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bring back the stats for the royal rumble matches like whos got th mkst eliminations and who entered the most. Someone delted it Themus3600 (talk) 19:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page used to have a section featuring all the records from the matches, they have been removed for some reason. I don’t see any reason why they would need to be removed. ~2025-37779-55 (talk) 17:45, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because it’s pure WP:FANCRUFT, all were unsourced, and pure filler. If Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia why does it have pure unencyclopedic content? Many fan wikis dissect the Rumble stats, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on reliable sources, we don’t have stuff like that. Lemonademan22 (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

well bring it back Themus3600 (talk) 20:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are being very rude and demanding. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, the “stats” as you call them were garbage dopamine addicting junk that are completely opposite as to the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia, go look on a fan wiki for them, there’s plenty out there, Wikipedia is not the place for such unencyclopedic content. Lemonademan22 (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The stats were facts mate dont get rude with me. They were there for for 20 years and you just got rid of them just leave them be people like reading then Themus3600 (talk) 22:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]