Talk:Voiced dental and alveolar lateral flaps: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 33: Line 33:

[[File:Information.svg|30px]]

[[File:Information.svg|30px]]

The redirect <span class=”plainlinks”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_R&redirect=no Japanese R]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at ”'{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 9#Japanese R}}”’ until a consensus is reached. <!– Template:RFDNote –> [[User:BodhiHarp|<span style=”color: orange;”>Bo</span><span style=”color:green;”>dhi</span><span style=”color:blue;”>Ha</span><span style=”color: purple;”>rp</span>]] 16:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

The redirect <span class=”plainlinks”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_R&redirect=no Japanese R]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at ”'{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 9#Japanese R}}”’ until a consensus is reached. <!– Template:RFDNote –> [[User:BodhiHarp|<span style=”color: orange;”>Bo</span><span style=”color:green;”>dhi</span><span style=”color:blue;”>Ha</span><span style=”color: purple;”>rp</span>]] 16:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

== Sourcing for Amis ==

@[[User:Oklopfer|Oklopfer]] I found sourcing for Amis. It is mentioned on [https://escholarship.org/content/qt3h25w3h3/qt3h25w3h3.pdf#page=48 this page] of the source cited by that Wikipedia article. – [[User:BodhiHarp|<span style=”color: blue;”>Bᴏᴅʜı</span><span style=”color: red;”>Hᴀᴙᴩ</span>]] ([[User talk:BodhiHarp|<span style=”color: green;”>talk</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/BodhiHarp|<span style=”color: purple;”>contributions</span>]]) 17:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 17:49, 18 December 2025

Well-written Yes
Structure: Yes
Understandable: Mostly, though I feel like things such as “indeterminate as to centrality” could be expounded upon for the benefit of non-linguists to understand.
  • Verifiability: General citations for the most part, one inline citation. It seems adequate.
  • Coverage of Topic: It seems complete.
Neutral Point of View: Yes
Supporting Material: Infobox and table are interesting

Overall rating: B

It seems rather complete, however I feel like more could be done. I’m unsure of what at this point in time. Perhaps the length is what gives me pause. I know there is only so much that can be said about certain phones, but I am still apprehensive about seeking a higher class for this, however if someone disagrees and believes that this is indeed complete and worthy of a classification above B, feel free to nominate it, or challenge me.

Wugapodes (talk) 03:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the postalveolar lateral flap mentioned in the retroflex article instead of here? BodhiHarp (talk) 00:42, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


The redirect Japanese R has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 9 § Japanese R until a consensus is reached. BodhiHarp 16:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Oklopfer I found sourcing for Amis. It is mentioned on this page of the source cited by that Wikipedia article. – BᴏᴅʜıHᴀᴙᴩ (talk, contributions) 17:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version