From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|
The title of this template, “North London Line (City Branch)”, seems misleading to me. As currently drawn, the template shows not only the historical North London Line (City Branch), but also the current East London Line. Perhaps it should be entitled something like “North London Line (City Branch) and current successor”. [[User:Trevorparsons|Trevorparsons]] ([[User talk:Trevorparsons|talk]]) 01:24, 19 October 2025 (UTC) |
The title of this template, “North London Line (City Branch)”, seems misleading to me. As currently drawn, the template shows not only the historical North London Line (City Branch), but also the current East London Line. Perhaps it should be entitled something like “North London Line (City Branch) and current successor”. [[User:Trevorparsons|Trevorparsons]] ([[User talk:Trevorparsons|talk]]) 01:24, 19 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:Having looked at the edit history of this template, it now seems to me that the incorporation of the current East London Line onto it, an edit which was first introduced by an anonymous editor in 2018, is unnecessary and confusing in the context of an article specifically about the historic line. I would suggest reverting this route template to the version which existed prior to the ELL overlay, viz https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:North_London_Line_(City_Branch)&oldid=831442835 [[User:Trevorparsons|Trevorparsons]] ([[User talk:Trevorparsons|talk]]) 01:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:39, 19 October 2025
|
||||||
The title of this template, “North London Line (City Branch)”, seems misleading to me. As currently drawn, the template shows not only the historical North London Line (City Branch), but also the current East London Line. Perhaps it should be entitled something like “North London Line (City Branch) and current successor”. Trevorparsons (talk) 01:24, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Having looked at the edit history of this template, it now seems to me that the incorporation of the current East London Line onto it, an edit which was first introduced by an anonymous editor in 2018, is unnecessary and confusing in the context of an article specifically about the historic line. I would suggest reverting this route template to the version which existed prior to the ELL overlay, viz https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:North_London_Line_(City_Branch)&oldid=831442835 Trevorparsons (talk) 01:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)


