::::::I would have said “since 1964”, or even “to 2016″, but obviously that would be wrong since the documentary is from 2006 (and thus didn’t take into account Obama or Trump yet). Putting an asterisk in the hook to show 2020 as a counterexample would complicate the hook and be outside the article’s scope, so this wording was the best I could come up with. I’m sure it could be workshopped further. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|<B><span style=”color:#0038A8″>Naruto</span><span style=”color:#FCD116″>love</span><span style=”color:#CE1126”>hinata</span>5</B>]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|contributions]]) 06:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
::::::I would have said “since 1964”, or even “to 2016″, but obviously that would be wrong since the documentary is from 2006 (and thus didn’t take into account Obama or Trump yet). Putting an asterisk in the hook to show 2020 as a counterexample would complicate the hook and be outside the article’s scope, so this wording was the best I could come up with. I’m sure it could be workshopped further. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|<B><span style=”color:#0038A8″>Naruto</span><span style=”color:#FCD116″>love</span><span style=”color:#CE1126”>hinata</span>5</B>]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|contributions]]) 06:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|Olliefant|Metropolitan90|Launchballer}} [[User:Narutolovehinata5|<B><span style=”color:#0038A8″>Naruto</span><span style=”color:#FCD116″>love</span><span style=”color:#CE1126″>hinata</span>5</B>]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|contributions]]) 01:32, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|Olliefant|Metropolitan90|Launchballer}} [[User:Narutolovehinata5|<B><span style=”color:#0038A8″>Naruto</span><span style=”color:#FCD116″>love</span><span style=”color:#CE1126″>hinata</span>5</B>]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|contributions]]) 01:32, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
:::::::I don’t have anything more to add right now. –[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 15:54, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
{{-}}}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–>
{{-}}}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–>
{{Pending DYK American hooks}}
{{Pending DYK American hooks}}
…So Goes the Nation
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 28 past nominations.
Olliefant (she/her) 08:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC).
- Comment. ALT0 is missing a word for it to make sense, and if I’m reading the article correctly, that word would be “one”: “… that one of the Republican activists interviewed in the 2006 documentary …So Goes the Nation later changed parties?” With regard to ALT2, if the filmmakers were “originally trying to document possible voter fraud” in the election, that implies that they might have changed their minds and decided to focus on something else, or perhaps that they couldn’t find evidence of voter fraud. What did they wind up with instead? I can’t really tell from the article. —Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:15, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Metropolitan90: I clarified that they dropped the voter fraud stuff, I couldn’t find why but Ill look again soon. Olliefant (she/her) 16:23, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- @Olliefant and Metropolitan90: Is this ready for review?–Launchballer 17:51, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- I assume that it was ready for review when the nomination was created, but I have no direct involvement with that determination. —Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:19, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
@Olliefant: Long enough, new enough. Both QPQs are done and Earwig is currently clean, though I removed one instance of WP:CLOP as part of a wholesale removal of WP:COATRACK material. No other reason why this might deserve a maintenance template. I’m afraid I find all of the hooks to be as dull as dishwater; what else have you got? Also, the image violates WP:DYKDIVERT and cannot run.–Launchballer 23:12, 14 December 2025 (UTC)- There isn’t much else in the article that seems to be hooky, so this seems to be the only one that sticks out:
- ALT4 … that the title of the 2006 documentary …So Goes the Nation comes from a saying on how Ohio tended to voted for the winner of the U.S. presidential election?
- I would have said “since 1964”, or even “to 2016”, but obviously that would be wrong since the documentary is from 2006 (and thus didn’t take into account Obama or Trump yet). Putting an asterisk in the hook to show 2020 as a counterexample would complicate the hook and be outside the article’s scope, so this wording was the best I could come up with. I’m sure it could be workshopped further. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Olliefant, Metropolitan90, and Launchballer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:32, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t have anything more to add right now. —Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- There isn’t much else in the article that seems to be hooky, so this seems to be the only one that sticks out:
- I assume that it was ready for review when the nomination was created, but I have no direct involvement with that determination. —Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:19, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Olliefant and Metropolitan90: Is this ready for review?–Launchballer 17:51, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
-
