From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|
* {{DYKmake|The Dance of Anitra|Usernameunique|subpage=The Dance of Anitra}} |
* {{DYKmake|The Dance of Anitra|Usernameunique|subpage=The Dance of Anitra}} |
||
|
–> |
–> |
||
|
* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article is new enough{{snd}}don’t be confused by the creation date, it was moved from the editor’s [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] on 9 December. Long enough. Both hooks are cited in the article, though ”’ALT1”’ cites a different source there than it does here. The rest of the article appears to be well-sourced. I’m personally partial to the first hook. |
|||
|
* <!– REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE the FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING THE ASTERISK * –> |
|||
|
The only reason I’m not immediately approving this is because a significant proportion of the article, at least two-thirds, is dedicated to extensive biographies of [[Edith Maryon]], [[Maud Allan]], and a description of the play ”[[Peer Gynt]]”. The information on Maryon is longer than her own article! This isn’t strictly a DYK issue, more a [[WP:GA]], but DYK guidelines allow for more subjective issues. |
|||
|
I would suggest significantly shortening these sections here and incorporating the additional information into their respective articles{{snd}}the section on Maryon could be copied verbatim into the article on her. I’d have to see how the article looks once this is done to properly assess it. [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 21:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC) |
|||
|
{{-}}}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–> |
{{-}}}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–> |
||
Revision as of 21:15, 9 December 2025
The Dance of Anitra
The Dance of Anitra
- Source: Dreweatts: “Surviving work by her in private hands seems to be extremely rare with just two other works appearing at auction in the last 30 years.”
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 87 past nominations.
Usernameunique (talk) 07:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC).
The only reason I’m not immediately approving this is because a significant proportion of the article, at least two-thirds, is dedicated to extensive biographies of Edith Maryon, Maud Allan, and a description of the play Peer Gynt. The information on Maryon is longer than her own article! This isn’t strictly a DYK issue, more a WP:GA, but DYK guidelines allow for more subjective issues.
I would suggest significantly shortening these sections here and incorporating the additional information into their respective articles – the section on Maryon could be copied verbatim into the article on her. I’d have to see how the article looks once this is done to properly assess it. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
