United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.: Difference between revisions

2023 United States Supreme Court case

United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.
Full case name	United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.
Docket no.	21-1052
Citations	599 U.S. ___ (more)
In a qui tam action filed under the False Claims Act, the United States may move to dismiss whenever it has intervened — whether during the seal period or later on.
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Majority	Kagan, joined by Roberts, Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson
Concurrence	Kavanaugh, joined by Barrett
Dissent	Thomas
False Claims Act

United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., 599 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that in a qui tam action filed under the False Claims Act, the United States may move to dismiss whenever it has intervened — whether during the seal period or later on. In assessing a motion to dismiss an FCA action over a relator’s objection, district courts should apply Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the rule generally governing voluntary dismissal of suits in ordinary civil litigation.^[1][2]

• Text of United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., 599 U.S. ___ (2023) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.