From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Help:Getting started|Welcome to Wikipedia]] and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/~2025-32081-79|your contribution(s)]]. However, as a [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|general rule]], while user talk pages permit a small degree of generali{{#switch:{{{sp}}}|us=z|uk=s|#default=s}}ation, other talk pages such as [[Talk:Creationism]] are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not a general discussion forum]] about the article’s topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the [[WP:Teahouse|Teahouse]]. Thanks.<!– Template:uw-chat1 –> [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 11:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Help:Getting started|Welcome to Wikipedia]] and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/~2025-32081-79|your contribution(s)]]. However, as a [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|general rule]], while user talk pages permit a small degree of generali{{#switch:{{{sp}}}|us=z|uk=s|#default=s}}ation, other talk pages such as [[Talk:Creationism]] are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not a general discussion forum]] about the article’s topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the [[WP:Teahouse|Teahouse]]. Thanks.<!– Template:uw-chat1 –> [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 11:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:By having an opinion claim (Creationism is pseudoscience) unsupported by quality sourcing right in the lede of the main article on Creationism it is difficult to avoid addressing the subject of its inclusion without going into subjects such as Creationism’s falsifiability contrasted with the falsifiability of [[Naturalism (philosophy]] which is its logical counter or Evolution and Big Bang more specifically, or the subject of prominent Creationists of the past and recent times such as those I mentioned. |
:By having an opinion claim (Creationism is pseudoscience) unsupported by quality sourcing right in the lede of the main article on Creationism it is difficult to avoid addressing the subject of its inclusion without going into subjects such as Creationism’s falsifiability contrasted with the falsifiability of [[Naturalism (philosophy]] which is its logical counter or Evolution and Big Bang more specifically, or the subject of prominent Creationists of the past and recent times such as those I mentioned. |
||
|
:Your newly attached source by the way appears to be a repeat of the same 1986 source that was already there by the way, you may want to remove it. [[Special:Contributions/~2025-32081-79|~2025-32081-79]] ([[User talk:~2025-32081-79|talk]]) 12:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC) |
:Your newly attached source by the way appears to be a repeat of the same 1986 source that was already there by the way, you may want to remove it. [[Special:Contributions/~2025-32081-79|~2025-32081-79]] ([[User talk:~2025-32081-79|talk]]) 12:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 12:42, 8 November 2025
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Creationism are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article’s topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Theroadislong (talk) 11:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- By having an opinion claim (Creationism is pseudoscience) unsupported by quality sourcing right in the lede of the main article on Creationism it is difficult to avoid addressing the subject of its inclusion without going into subjects such as Creationism’s falsifiability contrasted with the falsifiability of Naturalism (philosophy) which is its logical counter or Evolution and Big Bang more specifically, or the subject of prominent Creationists of the past and recent times such as those I mentioned.
- Your newly attached source by the way appears to be a repeat of the same 1986 source that was already there by the way, you may want to remove it. ~2025-32081-79 (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
