User talk:Adam98764: Difference between revisions

Welcome!

Hello, Adam98764, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There’s a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors’ help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!–Biografer (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Open Market Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Kaplan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4 Times Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Money (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adam98764. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2021 Ecuador General Election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adam98764. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, “2021 Ecuador General Election“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Open Market Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bullard.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashdod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamnia.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Longhornsg (talk) 04:05, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding unsourced (and inaccurate) information to articles, especially BLPs, in this topic area, as you did here, here, and here. Longhornsg (talk) 04:07, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All Eternals Deck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to We Shall All Be Healed, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article’s talk page. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:32, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Open Market Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna Paulson.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Swedes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]