User talk:Alfdeckse: Difference between revisions

 

Line 78: Line 78:

:@[[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] It’s been over 24 hours since my last revert on this page. [[User:Alfdeckse|Alfdeckse]] ([[User talk:Alfdeckse#top|talk]]) 00:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

:@[[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] It’s been over 24 hours since my last revert on this page. [[User:Alfdeckse|Alfdeckse]] ([[User talk:Alfdeckse#top|talk]]) 00:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

== CS1 error on [[Narai]] ==

[[File:Information icon4.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I’m [[User:Qwerfjkl (bot)|Qwerfjkl (bot)]]. I have ”’automatically detected”’ that [[Special:Diff/1335801193|this edit]] performed by you, on the page [[:Narai]], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

* A [[:Category:CS1 errors: dates|dates]] error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the [[MOS:DATEFORMAT|Wikipedia Manual of Style’s guidance on dates]]. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Narai&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1335801193%7CNarai%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a [[false positive]], you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Alfdeckse&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Narai}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1335801193 report it to my operator].

Thanks, <!– User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform –>[[User:Qwerfjkl (bot)|Qwerfjkl (bot)]] ([[User talk:Qwerfjkl (bot)|talk]]) 08:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Nikkimaria (talk) 00:08, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Ernest Augustus, King of Hanover, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word “vandalism” than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn’t mean to discourage editor, i was trying to add a caption on Ernest Augustus lead image as there were clear author and date but he/she keeps reverting it, what should I do? Alfdeckse (talk) 11:14, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There’s a section on the article talk page at Talk:Ernest Augustus, King of Hanover#Image where you can make your case. DrKay (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help Alfdeckse (talk) 23:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering about something

“Portrait by (name)”

“Photograph by (name)”

Some user said that adding caption like this make the article worse and it’s “unnecessary content” though I think adding caption just make the lead image more clear since the image can sometimes get mislabeled, adding some known info help to clarify and make the image more trustworthy and it’s add information that can’t been seen just by looking at the image

Is that an alright caption if the date is unknown but the author is known or I should just leave it or add something else instead?

Again thanks for your time Alfdeckse (talk) 17:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you’ve added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Imperial Noble Consort Chunhui

added a link pointing to Giuseppe Castiglione

Imperial Noble Consort Shujia

added a link pointing to Giuseppe Castiglione

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DrKay What sockpuppet? Can you explain, please? Alfdeckse (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought you were BlueDIAMOND20s but am not so sure now. I have undone the block. DrKay (talk) 07:53, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DrKay Ok, thanks Alfdeckse (talk) 07:55, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zaman Shah Durrani, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Durbaradded.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yu the Great, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ma Lin was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikkimaria It’s been over 24 hours since my last revert on this page. Alfdeckse (talk) 00:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Narai, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]