User talk:Altamashngp: Difference between revisions

 

Line 26: Line 26:

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India|Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India]] (October 24) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Dan arndt was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />

* [[WP:ORGDEPTH|”in-depth”]] (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

* [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

* [[WP:ORGIND|”strictly independent”]] of the subject <br />

Make sure you add references that meet ”all four” of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Fails [[WP:NORG]], requires significant coverage in multiple <u>independent</u> secondary sources.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Research_Society_for_the_Study_of_Diabetes_in_India ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Research_Society_for_the_Study_of_Diabetes_in_India ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 02:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, Altamashngp!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top