User talk:Amitunbind: Difference between revisions

Line 196: Line 196:

Thanks again, and happy editing!

”'[[User:Standgusto|Standgusto]]”’ ([[User talk:Standgusto|talk]]) 12:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC accept–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Vimal Arora|Vimal Arora]] (December 9) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by NeoGaze was:

{{divbox|gray|3=Subject seems notable, but there are too many instances of the source not supporting what is stated (failed verification) or statements that have no citations (citation needed). Please fix these issues before resubmitting.|}}<!–

—

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Vimal Arora]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Vimal_Arora ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NeoGaze&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vimal_Arora ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:NeoGaze|NeoGaze]] ([[User talk:NeoGaze|talk]]) 15:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Hello, I’m GMH Melbourne. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ESIM have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a “soapbox” are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 14:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Clear aligners. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amitunbind!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amitunbind. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Saral Home, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amitunbind. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Amitunbind|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jeraxmoira, I am not getting paid from Saral Home directly or indirectly. I am from New Delhi and last month my wife had ordered bedsheets and rugs from this company. Last week i saw them in my bedroom and then i wanted to know more about this brand and googled it. I saw their website. I liked it too. Later when i was using wikipedia, i wondered whether this brand is available on wikipedia, i tried searching and i didn’t found so i though of create a page for this brand. I was aware of its website so i added the its website address. if you feel that its against the Wikipedia norms then please let me know and i will remove them. It was just a fair trial i did to create a page as it was my first attempt to create a page on wikipedia. please let me know your thoughts. Thanks in Advance. Amitunbind (talk) 08:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article about Saral Home is not notable as it does not have enough coverage. You would be better off improving the existing articles on Wikipedia. The Suggested edits section on Special:Homepage will be a good place to start. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok, i will be keep on doing suggested edits and will create an article only when i find notable enough. Thank you. Amitunbind (talk) 08:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Saral Home, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Clove Dental, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 14:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you wish to recreate Clove Dental, I suggest you to provide reliable sources, and look at the previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clove Dental. Also, while you claim to have removed all the advertising content as per my belief, unsourced lists of possibly non-notable awards are still considered promotional. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia’s guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I have blocked you for one month for disruptive editing. Please be more careful when your block ends. Deb (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amitunbind (talk) 08:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ToThAc were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

ToThAc (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you @ToThAc for addressing the issue. I will fix the problems you have mentioned and then ask you to take a look again before actually resubmitting it for review. i hope you will help me. Amitunbind (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Highly Grateful that you replied.

I have deleted those paragraphs related to clear aligner and dental crowns as you pointed out. I was searching for references online but did not found anymore. All i found is these urls listing down here in case you wish to check:

https://www.wkindia.com/work/whistle-invisible-aligners/

https://www.afaqs.com/news/advertising/whistle-launches-mute-films

https://www.campaignindia.in/article/campaign-india-film-crest-awards-2024-shortlists-and-jury-announced/495804

https://www.medianews4u.com/whistle-quirkily-plays-up-confidence-that-comes-with-perfect-teeth-pitches-invisible-aligners/

https://www.financialexpress.com/business/healthcare-we-will-continue-to-scale-our-clinic-network-and-raise-awareness-among-consumers-amarinder-singh-founder-ceo-clove-dental-3446282/

Please let me know if it is good to be submitted or still has some issues that you can help me giving directions to correct. Amitunbind (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ToThAc just wondering have you saw my last message. I was looking for more reliable sources but on google and found these:

whistle was previously known as Love My Smile
This was registered on Crunchbase, url: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/lovemysmile I visited this url and found the link present under About section is www.lovemysmile.com which is redirecting to https://whistle.in/
On this page i have found Amarinder Singh as Chief Executive Officer and Owner

Now please help and suggest me if i should add this information to the current draft or not. Do you think that it is a valuable information and follows the wikipedia guidelines? Please suggest. Amitunbind (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discount the Campaign India source (third one on the list), as that’s just a passing mention. As for the others, I’ll be happy to discuss them at RSN. ToThAc (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ToThAc ok i have removed the third one campaign india source from references section of this article.

https://www.wkindia.com/work/whistle-invisible-aligners/ — this one i found on Wieden+Kennedy India website which is a famous American Ad agency whose wikipedia page is already present.

https://www.afaqs.com/news/advertising/whistle-launches-mute-films — this was the campaign that W+K did for Whistle in Dec 2023. I have also seen the video on youtube so i assumed that it is legit.

https://www.medianews4u.com/whistle-quirkily-plays-up-confidence-that-comes-with-perfect-teeth-pitches-invisible-aligners/ — This i believe is a pr and its also covering that W+K ad campaign that i mentioned.

https://www.financialexpress.com/business/healthcare-we-will-continue-to-scale-our-clinic-network-and-raise-awareness-among-consumers-amarinder-singh-founder-ceo-clove-dental-3446282/ — Here the CEO of the company Amarinder singh has mentioned about oral health, some health related facts. While reading this content i found about the mention of Whistle as a answer to this question “In recent times there has been also an increase in the D2C market of Dental products. How Clove is looking at them as a competitor or as a market?” I believe financialexpress.com is a famous website with legit value and can be consider as reliable source.

Apart from this i had also mentioned 3 more points, i am repeating it again (just in case you wish to address them too):

whistle was previously known as Love My Smile
This was registered on Crunchbase, url: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/lovemysmile I visited this url and found the link present under About section is www.lovemysmile.com which is redirecting to https://whistle.in/
On this page i have found Amarinder Singh as Chief Executive Officer and Owner

I know i am taking your valuable time on this and i really hope you will help me, am thankful for your responses. Please guide me here. Thanks. Amitunbind (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @ToThAc, i have revised the Draft here Draft:Whistle, can you please check and share your feedback here in my talk page, please. Amitunbind (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi @ToThAc i have been waiting on this nearly two months now, by any chance if you have a few mins, can you please recheck the draft i created and let me know if i should resubmit it. Amitunbind (talk) 05:43, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amitunbind. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whistle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:57, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @KylieTastic for giving me your valuable feedback, i will do some more research and if i find something more valuable, i will add on it and let you know for review before submitting it again. Amitunbind (talk) 11:44, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tilapta Karanwas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {u – t? – _uselessc} 15:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Matrix, Thanks a ton for making the page live and explaining about the Page Grade. I am so happy today as its my first live article at Wikipedia. your kind words made me feel more motivated and i will surely keep doing the quality contributions. Amitunbind (talk) 10:33, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were: The comment the reviewer left was:

Relies way too much on primary source in my opinion. Missing citations and overexaggerated award counts are a red flag. Please only list the most important roles, with those that have/warrant a wikipedia article preferred

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Khagendrawiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Vimal Arora have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do no remove declined tag from draft. Khagendra (talk) 08:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Khagendrawiki I was still working on it and did not submitted it for approval. If possible, please reverse to my recent contributions so that i can proceed further. Amitunbind (talk) 08:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Amitunbind the draft is currently not submitted (after 1st decline) , you may work on your draft (and consider taking reviewer’s advice) and whenever you feel you are ready to submit your draft for review you can simply click on blue “Resubmit” button on the left bottom side of the Draft just above the comment section. just to reassure you draft is currently not submitted for review . Khagendra (talk) 09:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply @Khagendrawiki, I have added lot of information available on different websites and online sources but most of them are not as strong as wikipedia requires, i felt that i should shorten the content and remove anything that may not fulfills Wikipedia guidelines and i cannot strongly cite from proper website as mentioned by @AlphaBetaGamma. I am trying to only keep those information that can be strongly cited. Hope you understand. Also can you please suggest me a good reviewer if you can. Amitunbind (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vimal Arora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Standgusto (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:

Subject seems notable, but there are too many instances of the source not supporting what is stated (failed verification) or statements that have no citations (citation needed). Please fix these issues before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

NeoGaze (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment